From: John Conzone (jkconzone@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 22 2000 - 07:41:10 GMT-3
Ryan, you can tell one DLSW peer to find a remote mac address on just
one per and one interface using the DLWS mac-addr command. I've never had
occasion to use it, but it looks like what you want to do and I'd be curious
to see if this solves your problem.
Its under the 11.3 configuration, IBM newtorking, DLSW, Tuning DLSW
capabilties. I couldn't attach the link correctly for some reason.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113ed_cr/i
bm_c/bcprt2/bcdlsw.htm#xtocid426224
----- Original Message -----
From: Ryan B <rbenigno@home.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 10:46 PM
Subject: DLSw Questions..
> R1 -> E0
> R2 -> Ring 2 & E0
> R3 -> Ring 1
>
>
> The requirement is to setup DLSw between these three routers. But, only
> allow R1's E0 to access R2's E0, and Ring 1 to access Ring 2. Would this
be
> right?
>
> (This is R2's config)
> dlsw port-list 1 Ethernet0
> dlsw ring-list 2 rings 2
> dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 192.168.5.5 lf 1500 ! R1
> dlsw remote-peer 2 tcp 192.168.3.3 ! R3
>
> The next one has me totally stumped... How would I setup R3 so explorer
> packets for the mac 000a.000b.000c would not get forwarded to Ring 2? If
> this was SRB without DLSw it could be done with an access-expression, but
if
> I add an an inbound access-expression to R3's To0 I would also deny that
> explorer from getting to R1's ethernet network... Any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Ryan
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:15 GMT-3