From: Earl Aboytes (earl@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 20 2000 - 03:00:35 GMT-3
The last time I took the lab, Jeffrey Zhang was the proctor and we received hal
f of the test in the AM and the other half in the PM. This is standard at San
Jose.
Earl
At 12:55 AM 4/20/00 -0400, Mosley, Arthur wrote:
>
>I received the whole 1st day when I took it. I spoke to someone who passed
>today and they received the full 1st day also.
>
>Art
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: AndyChang@mesiniaga.com.my
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Sent: 4/19/00 9:28 PM
>Subject: Format of CCIE lab changed?
>
>Hi all,
>
>I recently attended SIngapore's lab and was surprised by a few things.
>In my earlier attempt in Sydney, the whole 1st day's examination paper
>was given to me.
>
>However, in Singapore, I was given the 1st day's paper in two sections.
>AM (9:30-11:30am) and
>PM(12pm-5pm).
>The AM paper had requirements to set up routing domains etc. but did not
>specify the domain numbers
>to be used.
>The problem was that after lunch, the second part of the paper specified
>the domain numbers to be
>used and even some additional routing requirements.
>
>I found that I had to waste time reconfiguring/rechecking stuff I had
>done in the AM paper! I
>questioned the proctor and was
>told that this was a 'new' standard practised at all testing centres.
>
>Is this true? Can anyone confirm this? I find this 'new' rule
>ridiculuos! How can I plan the
>configuration without the second part of the paper? Further, if I am
>quicker in configuration, I may
>end up redoing a lot of the paper!
>
>The time given to me for configuration was 7 hours with 30 min for
>briefing on lab rules. In Sydney,
>we had 7.5 hours for lab and the time was 9-12:30, 1pm - 5pm. Why is
>this inconsistent? Again the
>proctor said that it is now 'standardized'.
>
>Can anyone confirm this?
>
>Thanks
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:14 GMT-3