From: Jim Ayers (jayers@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 22 1999 - 22:15:29 GMT-3
Dear GR:
Here's a sample config; it works regardless of the interface
configured on the other side of the switch :
FR-SWITCH#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration:
!
version 11.2
no service password-encryption
no service udp-small-servers
no service tcp-small-servers
!
hostname FR-SWITCH
!
!
no ip domain-lookup
frame-relay switching
!
interface Serial0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
clockrate 56000
frame-relay intf-type dce
frame-relay route 101 interface Serial1 111
frame-relay route 102 interface Serial1 112
frame-relay route 103 interface Serial1 113
!
interface Serial1
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
clockrate 56000
frame-relay intf-type dce
frame-relay route 111 interface Serial0 101
frame-relay route 112 interface Serial0 102
frame-relay route 113 interface Serial0 103
frame-relay route 114 interface Serial2 121
frame-relay route 115 interface Serial2 122
frame-relay route 116 interface Serial2 123
!
interface Serial2
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
clockrate 56000
frame-relay intf-type dce
frame-relay route 121 interface Serial1 114
frame-relay route 122 interface Serial1 115
frame-relay route 123 interface Serial1 116
!
interface Serial3
no ip address
shutdown
!
interface TokenRing0
no ip address
shutdown
!
interface BRI0
no ip address
shutdown
!
no ip classless
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
login
!
end
FR-SWITCH#
At 07:04 PM 8/22/1999 -0400, grcitynet wrote:
When configuring a router to be a frame-relay switch which is the
proper frame-relay
route statement. Assuming the router atached to int s0 is using
subinterfaces
s0.1 dlci 102 and s0.2 dlci 103.
Would it be
frame-relay route 201 int s0 102
frame-relay route 301 int s0 103
OR
frame-relay route 201 int s0.1 102
frame-relay route 301 int s0.2 103
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:47 GMT-3