From: Ron Trunk (rtrunk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 09 1999 - 17:04:40 GMT-3
Todd,
Most likely, the problem is that routers R2-R5 don't have a route to
the EBGP routes. Each route in the BGP table has a next-hop address.
If the router cannot get to the next hop address via IGP, the route
doesn't get entered into the routing table.
On router R1, use the next-hop-self keyword with the neighbor
statements for R2-R5. That way, R1 will advertise that it is the next
hop for the routes to R6.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Regonini <Todd_Regonini@ins.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Monday, August 09, 1999 3:44 PM
Fellow Groupstudy members,
I could really use some help with my BGP lab. Here is the scenario:
I have a backbone router (R6) that is injecting BGP routes from
several loopback addresses into my lab setup. I have a second router
(R1) running EBGP with this backbone router, and it sees all the
routes as it should, and they show up in the routing table as well. I
have several other routers (R2 - R5) running IBGP with the R1 router
that see the routes if I do a "sho ip bgp" all routes are there,
however, the routers other than R1 that are running IBGP don't have
the BGP routes in the routing table. Any ideas???? All of the
adjacencies are up and running fine, but I don't know why the routes
don't show up int the routing table. Any help would be greatly
appreciated. I can also send configs if necessary, but I did not
include here for the sake of brevity. Thanks again.
Todd Regonini
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:46 GMT-3