From: Jim Ayers (jayers@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 23 1999 - 09:29:22 GMT-3
At 07:49 AM 8/23/1999 -0700, Peter Van Oene wrote:
>You guys are missing the point. He's trying to frame switch off
>subinterfaces.
Sorry, if I missed the point. I assumed that GR had at least 2 serial ports (s
ay s0 and s1) on the fr-switch (ie. the "service provider side"). I also assum
ed the commands in the original email that GR was trying to enter are under the
s1 interface and the sub-interfaces in question are on the "customer premises
side."
Maybe if GR could clarify his scenario a little.
>Ie, he doesn't have a 4 port serial card and the sub interfaces are allowing
>multiple dlci's at the switch side. I've never tried this, but
>theoretically I see
>no reason why it wouldn't work. However, what you can do with it
>when its done is pretty limited given you can only cable it to one other
>switch :)
>
>Peter Van Oene
>Senior Systems Engineer
>UNIS LUMIN Inc.
>www.unislumin.com
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Jim Ayers <jayers@cisco.com>
>To: grcitynet <gr@citynet.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Sunday, August 22, 1999 6:15 PM
>Subject: Re:
>
>
> > Dear GR:
> >
> > Here's a sample config; it works regardless of the interface configured
>on the other side of the switch :
> >
> > FR-SWITCH#sho run
> > Building configuration...
> >
> > Current configuration:
> > !
> > version 11.2
> > no service password-encryption
> > no service udp-small-servers
> > no service tcp-small-servers
> > !
> > hostname FR-SWITCH
> > !
> > !
> > no ip domain-lookup
> > frame-relay switching
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > clockrate 56000
> > frame-relay intf-type dce
> > frame-relay route 101 interface Serial1 111
> > frame-relay route 102 interface Serial1 112
> > frame-relay route 103 interface Serial1 113
> > !
> > interface Serial1
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > clockrate 56000
> > frame-relay intf-type dce
> > frame-relay route 111 interface Serial0 101
> > frame-relay route 112 interface Serial0 102
> > frame-relay route 113 interface Serial0 103
> > frame-relay route 114 interface Serial2 121
> > frame-relay route 115 interface Serial2 122
> > frame-relay route 116 interface Serial2 123
> > !
> > interface Serial2
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > clockrate 56000
> > frame-relay intf-type dce
> > frame-relay route 121 interface Serial1 114
> > frame-relay route 122 interface Serial1 115
> > frame-relay route 123 interface Serial1 116
> > !
> > interface Serial3
> > no ip address
> > shutdown
> > !
> > interface TokenRing0
> > no ip address
> > shutdown
> > !
> > interface BRI0
> > no ip address
> > shutdown
> > !
> > no ip classless
> > !
> > line con 0
> > line aux 0
> > line vty 0 4
> > login
> > !
> > end
> >
> > FR-SWITCH#
> >
> > At 07:04 PM 8/22/1999 -0400, grcitynet wrote:
> > >When configuring a router to be a frame-relay switch which is the proper
>frame-relay
> > >route statement. Assuming the router atached to int s0 is using
>subinterfaces
> > >s0.1 dlci 102 and s0.2 dlci 103.
> > >
> > >Would it be
> > >
> > >frame-relay route 201 int s0 102
> > >frame-relay route 301 int s0 103
> > >
> > > OR
> > >
> > >frame-relay route 201 int s0.1 102
> > >frame-relay route 301 int s0.2 103
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:47 GMT-3