From: Mark, Detrick (mdetrick@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 17 1999 - 14:21:21 GMT-3
I'm sorry, you are right. The problem that I ran into was that...
The situation is that you have a frame relay network with
point-to-multipoint. The problem comes from the single point going to to
the multipoints because there is only ONE subnet being used (i.e.
10.0.0.0/24). You will not be able to use the SAME subnet on two different
interfaces on the same router, which is a requirement. Therefore, your IP
will get messed up. Additionally, I don't think that IPX will allow you to
use the same network number on two different interfaces on the same router.
Please correct me if I have the wrong situation.
Mark Detrick
DSL Business Unit
Cisco Systems
2569 McCabe Way
Irvine, CA 92614
----- Original Message -----
From: Vaughan Lee <vaughan.lee@debis.co.uk>
To: 'Mark, Detrick' <mdetrick@cisco.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: IPX over Frame Relay
> I'm going to have to play with this in the lab, but surely subinterfaces
> act as separate interfaces. If you've got one subinterface on one IPX
> network and a second subinterface on another IPX network, won't RIP
> updates be passed between the two even though they are on the same
> physical interface? Split horizon shouldn't get in the way here.
>
> Vaughan Lee, Network Specialist.
> debis IT Services (UK) Ltd.
> E-mail: vaughan.lee@debis.co.uk
> Direct Phone: 01908 279561
> Direct Fax: 01908 279061
> http://www.debis.co.uk/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark, Detrick [mailto:mdetrick@cisco.com]
> Sent: 17 May 1999 17:31
> To: Vaughan Lee
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IPX over Frame Relay
>
>
> Using subinterfaces won't make any difference. Split Horizon for the
> IPX
> RIP will still be enabled.
>
> Mark Detrick
> DSL Business Unit
> Cisco Systems
> 2569 McCabe Way
> Irvine, CA 92614
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Vaughan Lee <vaughan.lee@debis.co.uk>
> To: 'Ben Rife' <brife@bignet.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 1:29 AM
> Subject: RE: IPX over Frame Relay
>
>
> > I'm not sure if I'm missing out on something here, but isn't this a
> good
> > occasion to use sub-interfaces with the frame-relay connection?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vaughan Lee, Network Specialist.
> > debis IT Services (UK) Ltd.
> > E-mail: vaughan.lee@debis.co.uk
> > Direct Phone: 01908 279561
> > Direct Fax: 01908 279061
> > http://www.debis.co.uk/
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Rife [mailto:brife@bignet.net]
> > Sent: 14 May 1999 18:23
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: IPX over Frame Relay
> >
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> > Two months from today is the big day in RTP!
> >
> > Question: In my lab, I have a partial mesh Frame Relay setup. I
> > understand that you can not disable split-horizon for IPX/RIP on the
> Hub
> > router to avoid issues with split-horizon. What are my options to
> route
> > traffic between my spokes, other than eigrp, or static/default routes?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Benjy Rife
> > MCSE, CNE, CCIE Candidate
> > brife@bignet.net
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:37 GMT-3