RE: OSPF route-type per neighbor

Thanks everyone, this scenario just came in my mind and all i though it cannot
be done, but i was little bit wrong as i didn't thought about running multiple
ospf processes. I think running multiple processes is the best case otherwise
it might work or break

> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:59:56 +0100
> Subject: Re: OSPF route-type per neighbor
> From: alexeim73_at_gmail.com
> To: sammybibs_at_gmail.com
> CC: khanzadap_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> distribute-list for OSPF won't work either, as it is designed for filtering
> OSPF routes from being installed in the RIP. Besides match ip address in
> this case is for route source which is OSPF router ID, has nothing to do
> with actual prefix.
> The only way I see is to run two OSPF processes on two sides of the network
> and do a route type manipulation while redistributing between them. But as
> Tony asked "why, oh why???" :-)
>
>
> On 18 December 2013 10:14, Sam Bibby <sammybibs_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sam,
> >
> > On R1 when redistributing set them as E2 as you put them in, that's the
> > easy part.
> >
> > For making them E1 on r2 on ingress you could *try*:
> >
> > !R2
> > ip prefix-list SET->E1->To->E2 permit 1.1.1.0/24
> > !
> > route-map MED_TYPE_MOD permit 10
> > match ip address prefix-list SET->E1->To->E2
> > set metric-type type-1
> > !
> > route-map MED_TYPE_MOD permit 1000
> > !
> > Interface fas 0/0 !!!whatever interface is learning the routes
> > ip policy route-map MED_TYPE_MOD
> > !
> >
> >
> > I am not saying this will work, but it may be worth giving it a shot in
> > the lab. Or you could try applying the route map within ospf:
> > !!R2
> > router osfp 1
> > distribute-list route-map MED_TYPE_MOD in
> >
> > But as Al said, "would make the database inconsistent", so you prob can
do
> > it, but you may break stuff.
> >
> > My 2 cents :)
> >
> > \Sam
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Alexei Monastyrnyi
<alexeim73_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >> I reckon you can not, as the prefix is in the OSPF database and
> >> manipulating the routs type on hop by hop basis would make the database
> >> inconsistent. Entire OSPF logic relies on the database being consistent
> >> across the board.
> >>
> >> Unless I am missing something.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> A.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> > On 18 dec 2013, at 09:39, sameer khan <khanzadap_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > hey folks
> >> > 1.1.1.0/24|R1--R3| <http://1.1.1.0/24%7CR1--R3%7C> |R2--R4
> >> >
> >> > R1 is the asbr redistributing routes from rip (1.1.1.0/24). Is it
> >> possible to
> >> > set route-type to E1 for R2 and E2 for R3.
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >
> >> >
Received on Wed Dec 18 2013 - 11:33:16 ART