> I'm not sure why you would want to do this
If by this you meant RIPng then you are correct. If someone needs more
than "zero" RIPng instances then what they really need is a new job or to
look for a new certification ;-) It's off the R&S blueprint for a reason
as no one really would select it as a routing protocol for a network
today.
-- Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice) bdennis_at_ine.com INE, Inc. http://www.INE.com On 8/8/13 2:20 PM, "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan_at_ine.com> wrote: >RIPng runs at UDP 521. The reason you would need to change the port is >if you have multiple processes running on the same link, not on different >links. If your config looks like this, and you just have multiple >processes on the router, there's nothing you need to change: > >interface FastEthernet0/0 > ipv6 rip 1 enable >! >interface FastEthernet0/1 > ipv6 rip 2 enable > >If you have multiple processes on the same link then you can change the >ports to differentiate them, such as with this config: > >interface FastEthernet0/0 > ipv6 rip 1 enable >! >interface FastEthernet0/1 > ipv6 rip 2 enable >! >interface FastEthernet0/2 > ipv6 rip 1 enable > ipv6 rip 2 enable > >I'm not sure why you would want to do this, have multiple instances of >the routing process on the same link, but technically you can do it. If >you change the port just make sure you change it on both sides otherwise >the processes can't communicate. > > >HTH, > >Brian McGahan, 4 x CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP/SC/DC), CCDE #2013::13 >bmcgahan_at_INE.com > >Internetwork Expert, Inc. >http://www.INE.com > > >-----Original Message----- >From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >taiobtnh_at_gmail.com >Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 1:16 PM >To: Narbik Kocharians; routingfreak >Cc: Joe Sanchez; Daniel Barney Briseqo; CCIE Group Study >Subject: Re: RIPng UDP port > >The significance is that only one routing process will be able to run on >the udp port number 520,hence,if you've got two routing process on the >same router,you will need to manually assign another udp port to take >care of the second routing process. > >I hope this helps. You can check TCP/IP vol. 1 by Jeff Doyle. > >Cheers. >Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > >-----Original Message----- >From: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> >Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com >Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:08:37 >To: routingfreak<routingfreak_at_gmail.com> >Reply-To: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> >Cc: Joe Sanchez<marco207p_at_gmail.com>; Daniel Barney >BriseC1o<daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com>; CCIE Group >Study<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> >Subject: Re: RIPng UDP port > >You can configure it under the routing process. > >IPv6 router rip tst > Port 5021 > > >On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:11 PM, routingfreak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com> >wrote: > >> I am not seeing the command which u have mentioned. Which particular >> release r u using . Ca n tell me the significance f this command. >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Do you have a link for the documentation? >> > >> > Regards, >> > Joe Sanchez >> > >> > ( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a >> > mobile device. >> > Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.) >> > >> > On Aug 7, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Daniel Barney BriseC1o >> > <daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Guys >> > > I found it! Rip processes do not separate with different rip >> > > process >> > labels. >> > > To separate the routing information between two diffent rip label >> > process we >> > must change the port of under de routing process with port >> > port-number multicast-group multicast-address >> > > >> > > >> > > > CC: daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com >> > > > From: marco207p_at_gmail.com >> > > > Subject: Re: RIPng UDP port >> > > > Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:04:07 -0500 >> > > > To: narbikk_at_gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > AFAIK, only if you VRF it out. >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > Joe Sanchez >> > > > >> > > > ( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a >> > > > mobile >> > device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.) >> > > > >> > > > On Aug 6, 2013, at 6:19 AM, Narbik Kocharians >> > > > <narbikk_at_gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Daniel, >> > > > > >> > > > > Are you talking about running two different RIPng processes on >> > > > > the >> > same >> > > > > router? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Daniel Barney Briseqo < >> > > > > daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Hello every one,A couple of weeks ago I read about RIPng, >> > > > >> Today >> > while >> > > > >> doing a lab, a doubt came to me and I could find the >> > > > >> reference >> > back. I >> > was >> > > > >> hoping you guys can help me. >> > > > >> When having two different RIPng labels, Do we need to change >> > > > >> de >> udp >> > port >> > > > >> 521 >> > > > >> for one routing process in order to work? If yes, how can we >> archive >> > this >> > > > >> and >> > > > >> if possible could you send me the link reference please Thank >> > > > >> you :)Daniel Barney >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > ____________________________________________________________________ >> > ___ >> > > > >> Subscription information may be found at: >> > > > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > *Narbik Kocharians >> > > > > *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) >> > > > > *www.MicronicsTraining.com* >> > > > > <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> >> > > > > Sr. Technical Instructor >> > > > > YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! >> > > > > A Cisco Learning Partner >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > ____________________________________________________________________ >> > ___ >> > > > > Subscription information may be found at: >> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> > >> > >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> > >> > ____________________________________________________________________ >> > ___ Subscription information may be found at: >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> Routing Freak CCIE#35889 (SPv3) >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> _ Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >-- >*Narbik Kocharians >*CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) >*www.MicronicsTraining.com* <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> >Sr. Technical Instructor >YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! >A Cisco Learning Partner > > >Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > >_______________________________________________________________________ >Subscription information may be found at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > >Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > >_______________________________________________________________________ >Subscription information may be found at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > >Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > >_______________________________________________________________________ >Subscription information may be found at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Aug 08 2013 - 17:46:52 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 01 2013 - 08:35:50 ART