Re: Redistribution between EIGRP and BGP

I don't believe you can do double redistribution like that on a router. If
you have a local route that you want to get into BGP, you should originate
it directly in BGP with a network statement or redistribute connected into
BGP. I'm fairly certain this won't work if you try to redistribute
connected into EIGRP and then redistribute EIGRP into BGP. It's not
something I've tried in a long time, so maybe I'm getting some of the
details wrong. Better double-check what I say. :-)

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Muzammil Mukhtar <
muzammil_mukhtar_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> I've a redistribution question between EIGRP and BGP in regards to
> connected
> routes, we've a loopback interface that is being advertised into EIGRP via
> network statement and then we are redistributing EIGRP into BGP. Do we
> need
> to explicitly redistribute connected into BGP or network statement in
> EIGRP is
> enough to tell BGP to advertise the subnet out. I remember reading it
> somewhere that BGP will pickup what ever is in the route-table from EIGRP
> plus
> what ever is defined in the network statement.
>
> Muzammil
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Aug 05 2013 - 22:20:53 ART