Re: ISIS Single-topology VS Multitopology Metric Query

No problem! Glad to help.

On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Rakesh M <raaki.88_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Ahh , It was staring at me ! Thanks John
>
>
> R5(config-if)#isis ipv6 metric 40
> R5(config-if)#end
> R5#show i
> *Mar 1 01:13:04.903: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
>
> R5#show ipv6 route 2001::3
> IPv6 Routing Table - 7 entries
>
> I2 2001::3/128 [115/60]
>
> via FE80::C002:3FF:FEA0:1, FastEthernet0/1
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM, John Neiberger <jneiberger_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Try using "isis ipv6 metric". I believe that the "isis metric" command
>> does only affect ipv4 routes, as you saw.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Rakesh M <raaki.88_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was testing single vs multitopology for isis. I have incremented
>>> Link-Metric for a specific interface, but noticed it only effects Ipv4
>>> incoming routes but not Ipv6 incoming routes, is this expected ?
>>>
>>> R5#show run int fa0/1
>>> Building configuration...
>>>
>>> Current configuration : 175 bytes
>>> !
>>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>>> ip address 23.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
>>> ip router isis 1
>>> duplex auto
>>> speed auto
>>> ipv6 address 2001:45::5/64
>>> ipv6 router isis 1
>>> isis metric 40
>>> end
>>>
>>>
>>> R5#show ipv6 route 2001::3
>>> IPv6 Routing Table - 7 entries
>>>
>>> I2 2001::3/128 [115/30]
>>> [--------------------------------------------------> 30
>>> via FE80::C002:3FF:FEA0:1, FastEthernet0/1
>>>
>>>
>>> R5#show ip route
>>> 3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>> i L2 3.3.3.3 [115/60] via 20.4.5.4, FastEthernet0/1
>>> ------------------->
>>> 60
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Rakesh
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Aug 04 2013 - 00:35:25 ART