Re: tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng

thank you. I clearly need to do some more reading.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Yuri Bank <yuribank_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> No you would not use this command with traffic-eng tunnel. It would have
> no affect
>
> -YuriB
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Eduardo Vazquez
<evazquez_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Yuri,
>>
>> Would you use a "qos pre-classify" command on the tunnel like GRE or not?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ed Vazquez
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Yuri Bank <yuribank_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Not exactly. 'tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng' is for setting up RSVP
>>> signaled LSPs. It is not a logical interface in the same way a GRE/IP-IP
>>> tunnel. So you do not configure your routing protocols directly on them.
>>> Normally you would create static routes, across them, or use autoroute
>>> announce to make your IGP use the LSP. IPv6 can be forwarded over RSVP
>>> signaled LSPs the same way as LDP signaled LSPs (using 6PE or 6VPE).
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. You do not apply policy-maps on the tunnel interface itself. You
>>> would mark your traffic on the CE facing interfaces, for example.
>>>
>>> -YuriB
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Eduardo Vazquez
<evazquez_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I am very unfamiliar with this tunnel type, so I have 2 probably stupid
>>>> questions.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Can you pass IPv6 over this type of tunnel? Meaning, is there a
>>>> possibility to form ospf v3 relationships or eigrp from one side to the
>>>> other?
>>>>
>>>> 2. How does one classify (EXP bits) or policy map a tunnel like this?
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the broad questions.
>>>>
>>>> Ed Vazquez
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jul 23 2013 - 14:50:08 ART