Re: tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng

No you would not use this command with traffic-eng tunnel. It would have no
affect

-YuriB

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Eduardo Vazquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Yuri,
>
> Would you use a "qos pre-classify" command on the tunnel like GRE or not?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed Vazquez
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Yuri Bank <yuribank_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1. Not exactly. 'tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng' is for setting up RSVP
>> signaled LSPs. It is not a logical interface in the same way a GRE/IP-IP
>> tunnel. So you do not configure your routing protocols directly on them.
>> Normally you would create static routes, across them, or use autoroute
>> announce to make your IGP use the LSP. IPv6 can be forwarded over RSVP
>> signaled LSPs the same way as LDP signaled LSPs (using 6PE or 6VPE).
>>
>>
>> 2. You do not apply policy-maps on the tunnel interface itself. You would
>> mark your traffic on the CE facing interfaces, for example.
>>
>> -YuriB
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Eduardo Vazquez
<evazquez_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I am very unfamiliar with this tunnel type, so I have 2 probably stupid
>>> questions.
>>>
>>> 1. Can you pass IPv6 over this type of tunnel? Meaning, is there a
>>> possibility to form ospf v3 relationships or eigrp from one side to the
>>> other?
>>>
>>> 2. How does one classify (EXP bits) or policy map a tunnel like this?
>>>
>>> Sorry for the broad questions.
>>>
>>> Ed Vazquez
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jul 23 2013 - 12:43:38 ART