Re: MPLS LDP IGP Sync HOLDDOWN?

Thanks Yuri!!...that's exactly what I was looking for. I could not generate
an example where the IGP session would stay down. I was only able to get
the max cost advertised...This brings me to another questions. If the rules
for LDP IGP Sync say that if the LDP peer is reachable but the LDP session
is not up, by default the IGP connections will be in down state
indefinitely (unless you configure the holddown timers). But my question
is if the LDP session is down how is the router going to know what's the
LDP peer's transport IP to check if it is reachable? If LDP hellos are
never sent they will not know about each other. I am missing another rule
in the LDP IGP Sync feature?

For example I referenced this topology at
http://kemot-net.wdfiles.com/local--files/mpls-ldp-igp-synchronization/mpls%20ldp%20igp%20sync%20001.JPG

R4's Gi2/0 is down, because R3's Gi2/0 does not have "mpls ip" configured.
IGP and LDP are not synchronized.

R4#sh ip ospf mpls ldp interface gi2/0
GigabitEthernet2/0
  Process ID 1, Area 0
  LDP is configured through LDP autoconfig
  LDP-IGP Synchronization : Required
  Holddown timer is not configured
  Interface is down and pending LDP <<------------interface down

Router R4 does not see the transport IP of the peer, since it doesn't get
any LDP hellos.

R4#sh mpls ldp discovery detail
 Local LDP Identifier:
    4.4.4.4:0
    Discovery Sources:
    Interfaces:
        GigabitEthernet1/0 (ldp): xmit/recv
                ....
        GigabitEthernet2/0 (ldp): *xmit*
            Enabled: IGP config;
            Hello interval: 5000 ms; Transport IP addr: 4.4.4.4
            Clients: IPv4, mLDP

...so how is R4 able to detect the reachability of R3's peer IP address per
the feature's rules?

Thank you,

Tom

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Yuri Bank <yuribank_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> What if you're using LDP autoconfiguration? You may have some links to non
> MPLS enabled routers/devices, that are running a IGP (Such as a Load
> balancer, firewall etc...) Without specifying a holddown time the IGP
> adjacency would never come up. Although in that situation it would be best
> to disable mpls entirely on those interfaces.
>
> -YuriB
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to figure out why would anyone use the holddown option for IGP
>> Sync? Does is not advertise the max metric after the timers expires for
>> the
>> link having synchronization issue? If that's the case why would you enable
>> the sync feature in the first time if it will be bypassed after the
>> holddown timer expires? Am I missing something?
>>
>> I have a topology I'm testing this feature. Instead of filling up the
>> email
>> with attachments I put the image at
>> http://wiki.kemot-net.com/mpls-ldp-igp-synchronization
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Tom Kacprzynski
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jul 03 2013 - 23:18:04 ART