RE: xconnect

From: Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:52:26 +0300

Hi
Thanks for the reply Darlington
Well , I have tried L2TPv3 as well and worked fine
But I have another question since we are talking about L2TPv3
I have the below topologyR1 - R2 - R3 - R4I have configured L2TPv3 between R2 and R3 in order to achieve connectivity between R1 and R4 which are enabled for both IPv4 and IPv6R1#sh run int s1/0Building configuration...Current configuration : 352 bytes!interface Serial1/0ip address 192.1.14.1 255.255.255.0encapsulation frame-relayipv6 address 2001:192:14::1/64ipv6 rip RIPng enableserial restart-delay 0frame-relay map ipv6 2001:192:14::4 101 broadcastframe-relay map ipv6 FE80::C804:13FF:FEA2:0 101 broadcastframe-relay map ip 192.1.14.4 101 broadcastframe-relay lmi-type ansiendR2#sh run int s1/0Building configuration...Current configuration : 69 bytes!interface Serial1/0no ip addressencapsulation frame-relayendR2#sh run | sec connectconnect FR Serial1/0 202 l2transportxconnect 3.3.3.3 14 pw-class CLASSR2#sh run | sec psepseudowire-class CLASSencapsulation l2tpv3interworking ipip local interface Loopback0R3#sh run int s1/0Building configuration...Current configuration : 69 byte!
 s!interface Serial1/0no ip addressencapsulation frame-relayendR3#sh run | sec connectconnect FR Serial1/0 303 l2transportxconnect 2.2.2.2 14 pw-class CLASS!R3#sh run | sec psepseudowire-class CLASSencapsulation l2tpv3interworking ipip local interface Loopback0R4#sh run int s1/0Building configuration...Current configuration : 352 bytes!interface Serial1/0ip address 192.1.14.4 255.255.255.0encapsulation frame-relayipv6 address 2001:192:14::4/64ipv6 rip RIPng enableserial restart-delay 0frame-relay map ipv6 2001:192:14::1 404 broadcastframe-relay map ipv6 FE80::C801:13FF:FE92:0 404 broadcastframe-relay map ip 192.1.14.1 404 broadcastframe-relay lmi-type ansiendNow the connectivity for IPv4 is there and working fine , but the issue is in IPv6 , am i missing something?ThanksBR,

> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:35:58 +0300
> Subject: Re: xconnect
> From: ngaissod_at_gmail.com
> To: eng_mssk_at_hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> Hi Mohammed
>
> The other way to do this is to use L2tpv3 and in this case you dont
> need to worry about MPLS
>
> below is the config
>
>
> *pseudowire-class 52*
>
> *ip local interface lo0*
>
> *encapsulation l2tvp3*
>
>
>
> R2#sh run int s2/0
>
> interface Serial2/0
>
> no ip address
>
> no keepalive
>
> serial restart-delay 0
>
> * xconnect 5.5.5.5 16 pw-class 52*
>
>
>
> R5#sh run int s2/0
>
> interface Serial2/0
>
> no ip address
>
> no keepalive
>
> serial restart-delay 0
>
> * xconnect 2.2.2.2 16 pw-class 52*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk_at_hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have established the below topology
> > R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6
> > Where R1 , R2 , R3 resides in AS 100 and the other routers in AS 200
> > I have established eBGP between R3 and R4 , OSPF is running in AS 100
> > between R2 , R3 and ISIS in AS 200 between R4 , R5
> > Then I have redistributed the R4 , R5 loopbacks in AS 100 , and vice versa
> > for R2 , R3 loopbacks in AS 200 in order to get labels for these loopbacks
> > What I have reached so far (i am trying to configure xconnect between R2
> > and R5 with MPLS encapsulation) is the l2transport is up
> >
> > R2#sh run int s2/0
> > interface Serial2/0
> > no ip address
> > no keepalive
> > serial restart-delay 0
> > xconnect 5.5.5.5 16 encapsulation mpls
> >
> >
> > R5#sh run int s2/0
> > interface Serial2/0
> > no ip address
> > no keepalive
> > serial restart-delay 0
> > xconnect 2.2.2.2 16 encapsulation mpls
> >
> > R2#show mpls l2transport summary
> > Destination address: 5.5.5.5, total number of vc: 1
> > 0 unknown, 1 up, 0 down, 0 admin down, 0 recovering, 0 standby, 0
> > hotstandby
> > 1 active vc on MPLS interface Fa1/0
> >
> > R5#show mpls l2transport summary
> > Destination address: 2.2.2.2, total number of vc: 1
> > 0 unknown, 1 up, 0 down, 0 admin down, 0 recovering, 0 standby, 0
> > hotstandby
> > 1 active vc on MPLS interface Fa1/0
> >
> > But no connectivity between R1 and R6 , what is missing ? I have tried to
> > change the MTU to 1504 but nothing changed
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > BR,
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jun 18 2013 - 10:52:26 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 01 2013 - 06:58:42 ART