Re: Offset List vs Distribute List

I meant advertised distance

Enviado desde Samsung Mobile

-------- Mensaje original --------
De: CCIE Ninja <ccieninja_at_yahoo.com>
Fecha:
A: gaston brait <gbrait_at_hotmail.com>,Rakesh M <raaki.88_at_gmail.com>,Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Asunto: Re: Offset List vs Distribute List
 
*Manipulating the metric (hop count)

From: gaston brait <gbrait_at_hotmail.com>
To: Rakesh M <raaki.88_at_gmail.com>; Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 3:58 AM
Subject: RE: Offset List vs Distribute List

In my opinion I would go with a distribute list.With the offset-list you are
just manipulating the AD and in this case making it unreachable.
Regards,
Gaston

> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:02:49 +0530
> Subject: Offset List vs Distribute List
> From: raaki.88_at_gmail.com
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> Hi All,
>
> In a RIPV2 filtering task, a certain prefix was not supposed to be
> advertised to a peer. I used Distribute list while the solution used by the
> vendor was offset-list with metric out as 14. Though both of them would
> still work, is there any technical advantage of having one over the other,
> if asked in lab about filtering which method should be used.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Any Fool can Know The Point is to Understand - Einstein
>
> www.cciematrix.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Apr 19 2013 - 09:22:08 ART