*Manipulating the metric (hop count)
________________________________
From: gaston brait <gbrait_at_hotmail.com>
To: Rakesh M <raaki.88_at_gmail.com>; Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 3:58 AM
Subject: RE: Offset List vs Distribute List
In my opinion I would go with a distribute list.With the offset-list you are
just manipulating the AD and in this case making it unreachable.
Regards,
Gaston
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:02:49 +0530
> Subject: Offset List vs Distribute List
> From: raaki.88_at_gmail.com
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> Hi All,
>
> In a RIPV2 filtering task, a certain prefix was not supposed to be
> advertised to a peer. I used Distribute list while the solution used by the
> vendor was offset-list with metric out as 14. Though both of them would
> still work, is there any technical advantage of having one over the other,
> if asked in lab about filtering which method should be used.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Any Fool can Know The Point is to Understand - Einstein
>
> www.cciematrix.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 18 2013 - 23:17:58 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 01 2013 - 06:47:40 ART