Re: Cisco 3750G Scalability

which scenario or environment best fit configuring 3750 with vrf lite...

ABDULLAHI BEGE
Snr. Network Engineer.
CCIE# 37630 RnS.

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> Im trying, but still dont know what youre asking. If youre asking
> if multiple customers can be supported with VRF-lite on a 3750, then yes,
> you can do that.****
>
> ** **
>
> -ryan****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Prince Emirate [mailto:begeieia_at_googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:30 PM
> *To:* Ryan West
> *Cc:* Tony Singh; Gilles Fabre; Cisco certification
> *Subject:* Re: Cisco 3750G Scalability****
>
> ** **
>
> which scenario best fit configuring VRF-lite on Access switches such as
> 3750/3560 ?****
>
>
> ****
>
> ABDULLAHI BEGE****
>
> Snr. Network Engineer.****
>
> CCIE# 37630 RnS.****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:****
>
> Where is the question?
>
> Sent from handheld.****
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:10 PM, "Prince Emirate" <begeieia_at_googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Guyz,
> > Please one quick question: which scenario best fit configuring VRF-lite
> on
> > Access switches such as 3750/3560. my unit manage different customer and
> > I'm looking at option of deploying such technology..
> >
> > Any Input will be highly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Abdullahi Bege
> > Snr. Network Engineer.
> > CCIE# 37630 RnS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Should be fine, I was looking at this for the 3750-X's and it said 30
> max,
> >> so not trusting it I went through ospf 1-31 with 31 being denied
> because of
> >> too many processes....
> >>
> >> There's 512mb of RAM on the X's so I would check on the G's
> >>
> >> What is your topology if you don't mind me asking as it is possible if
> >> your using routers to just use a vlan to bridge the vrf
> >>
> >> --
> >> BR
> >>
> >> Tony
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On 9 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Gilles Fabre <fabre.gilles_at_voila.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> We have a 3750G stack running L3 protocols & VRF-lite/OSPF
> >>> At the moment, we have 3 local VRF running, with a separate OPSF
> process
> >> for
> >>> each of them (stub mode), working well.
> >>>
> >>> We have a need to implement about 10 VRF more.
> >>> I would like to know if some of you already deployed this kind of setup
> >> & if
> >>> you observed some limitations on the actual number of vrf/ospf
> processes
> >> to
> >>> run on this platform.
> >>>
> >>> According to the Cisco documentation, 3750 can host up to 26 VRF (IOS
> >>> limitation), but I would be interested if some of you already deployed
> >> this
> >>> kind of setup & what the results were.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance
> >>> Gilles.
> >>> ___________________________________________________________
> >>> Qu'y a-t-il ce soir C la tC)lC) ? D'un coup d'E il, visualisez le
> >> programme
> >>> sur Voila.fr http://tv.voila.fr/programmes/chaines-tnt/ce-soir.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >****
>
> ** **

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Apr 12 2013 - 10:29:58 ART