Ah ok so just a p2p transit, your right for this task seems strange...what did
further tasks ask you to do?
Failing this is their feedback you can provide to 360
-- BR Tony Sent from my iPad On 1 Apr 2013, at 17:24, Eduardo VC!zquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > R1--S0/1--10.1.1.1/24--DLCI201--frame relay switch--DLCI102--10.1.1.2/24--S0/1--R2 > > It was a very simple resolution LMI type was incorrect on one side. Took the erroneous LMI type statement out, and ping works. > > Thanks, > > Ed Vazquez > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com> wrote: > So you got the same subnets behind two different routers? > > Draw a topology please > > -- > BR > > Tony > > Sent from my iPad > > On 1 Apr 2013, at 16:53, Eduardo VC!zquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > Tony, > > > > The routers were connected to the network in question, RX 10.1.1.x/24 > > connected to RY 10.1.1.y/24. > > * > > * > > *Resolve connection problem. The following command should show responses:* > > * > > * > > *RX# ping 10.1.1.y* > > > > That is pretty much it. > > > > If they said that it was a router on another network, then fine you need a > > routing protocol...but as it is if the ping is successful, I think good > > done with that moving on to the next one. > > > > John, > > > > I guess what I am wondering is, if this type of grading is in affect for > > the actual test. the test I am talking about is only a > > practice assessment. > > > > Thanks everyone for their insight. > > > > e > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, john matijevic > > <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> If you feel you passed the lab exam, you can request a re-read. > >> I believe you need 80% on both Troubleshooting and 80% on > >> Configuration to pass the lab exam. > >> There should be no doubt whatsoever so if you feel you passed and got > >> working per the requirement, then I would go ahead and do the reread. > >> No need to explain yourself here, go towards Cisco and work it out with > >> them. > >> > >> Regards, > >> John > >> On 4/1/13, Eduardo Vazquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Hello Everyone, > >>> > >>> I am on my 4th attempt at passing the lab exam and as an > >>> additional exercise I thought that I would try one of the assessments > >> that > >>> the 360 program offers. > >>> > >>> It seems that I did not pass the troubleshooting section although I fixed > >>> the problems. Not to be too specific, but in a frame relay scenario they > >>> ask you to fix a problem in which one host can not ping the other. I > >> fixed > >>> the problem so that I could ping the other side successfully, but I did > >> not > >>> get the points because I did not put a "broadcast" statement in the map. > >>> No where in the scenario did it say, "the command "ping x.x.x.x" should > >>> work AND make sure that you can run multicast over the link as well." > >> Only > >>> that "ping x.x.x.x should work." > >>> > >>> I missed 3 questions in where I met the scenario's requirements. I did > >> miss > >>> one legitamately, but one as opposed to 4 is the difference between pass > >>> and fail. > >>> > >>> I am not sure what to do about this should I always infer that even if I > >>> solve the problem described that there may be a hidden issue as well? > >>> > >>> Should I address this with Cisco360? I am a bit discouraged by this, as > >> I > >>> felt very confident about the material. > >>> > >>> Thanks for any insight people can share. > >>> > >>> Ed Vazquez > >>> > >>> > >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________________________________ > >>> Subscription information may be found at: > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Apr 01 2013 - 17:28:19 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 01 2013 - 06:47:40 ART