Re: CCIE RS Lab Grading Question

R1--S0/1--10.1.1.1/24--DLCI201--frame relay
switch--DLCI102--10.1.1.2/24--S0/1--R2

It was a very simple resolution LMI type was incorrect on one side. Took
the erroneous LMI type statement out, and ping works.

Thanks,

Ed Vazquez

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> So you got the same subnets behind two different routers?
>
> Draw a topology please
>
> --
> BR
>
> Tony
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 1 Apr 2013, at 16:53, Eduardo Vazquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tony,
> >
> > The routers were connected to the network in question, RX 10.1.1.x/24
> > connected to RY 10.1.1.y/24.
> > *
> > *
> > *Resolve connection problem. The following command should show
> responses:*
> > *
> > *
> > *RX# ping 10.1.1.y*
> >
> > That is pretty much it.
> >
> > If they said that it was a router on another network, then fine you need
> a
> > routing protocol...but as it is if the ping is successful, I think good
> > done with that moving on to the next one.
> >
> > John,
> >
> > I guess what I am wondering is, if this type of grading is in affect for
> > the actual test. the test I am talking about is only a
> > practice assessment.
> >
> > Thanks everyone for their insight.
> >
> > e
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, john matijevic
> > <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> If you feel you passed the lab exam, you can request a re-read.
> >> I believe you need 80% on both Troubleshooting and 80% on
> >> Configuration to pass the lab exam.
> >> There should be no doubt whatsoever so if you feel you passed and got
> >> working per the requirement, then I would go ahead and do the reread.
> >> No need to explain yourself here, go towards Cisco and work it out with
> >> them.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> John
> >> On 4/1/13, Eduardo Vazquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hello Everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I am on my 4th attempt at passing the lab exam and as an
> >>> additional exercise I thought that I would try one of the assessments
> >> that
> >>> the 360 program offers.
> >>>
> >>> It seems that I did not pass the troubleshooting section although I
> fixed
> >>> the problems. Not to be too specific, but in a frame relay scenario
> they
> >>> ask you to fix a problem in which one host can not ping the other. I
> >> fixed
> >>> the problem so that I could ping the other side successfully, but I did
> >> not
> >>> get the points because I did not put a "broadcast" statement in the
> map.
> >>> No where in the scenario did it say, "the command "ping x.x.x.x" should
> >>> work AND make sure that you can run multicast over the link as well."
> >> Only
> >>> that "ping x.x.x.x should work."
> >>>
> >>> I missed 3 questions in where I met the scenario's requirements. I did
> >> miss
> >>> one legitamately, but one as opposed to 4 is the difference between
> pass
> >>> and fail.
> >>>
> >>> I am not sure what to do about this should I always infer that even if
> I
> >>> solve the problem described that there may be a hidden issue as well?
> >>>
> >>> Should I address this with Cisco360? I am a bit discouraged by this,
> as
> >> I
> >>> felt very confident about the material.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for any insight people can share.
> >>>
> >>> Ed Vazquez
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 01 2013 - 11:24:28 ART