Re: CCIE RS Lab Grading Question

Tony,

The routers were connected to the network in question, RX 10.1.1.x/24
connected to RY 10.1.1.y/24.
*
*
*Resolve connection problem. The following command should show responses:*
*
*
*RX# ping 10.1.1.y*

That is pretty much it.

If they said that it was a router on another network, then fine you need a
routing protocol...but as it is if the ping is successful, I think good
done with that moving on to the next one.

John,

I guess what I am wondering is, if this type of grading is in affect for
the actual test. the test I am talking about is only a
practice assessment.

Thanks everyone for their insight.

e

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, john matijevic
<john.matijevic_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> If you feel you passed the lab exam, you can request a re-read.
> I believe you need 80% on both Troubleshooting and 80% on
> Configuration to pass the lab exam.
> There should be no doubt whatsoever so if you feel you passed and got
> working per the requirement, then I would go ahead and do the reread.
> No need to explain yourself here, go towards Cisco and work it out with
> them.
>
> Regards,
> John
> On 4/1/13, Eduardo Vazquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I am on my 4th attempt at passing the lab exam and as an
> > additional exercise I thought that I would try one of the assessments
> that
> > the 360 program offers.
> >
> > It seems that I did not pass the troubleshooting section although I fixed
> > the problems. Not to be too specific, but in a frame relay scenario they
> > ask you to fix a problem in which one host can not ping the other. I
> fixed
> > the problem so that I could ping the other side successfully, but I did
> not
> > get the points because I did not put a "broadcast" statement in the map.
> > No where in the scenario did it say, "the command "ping x.x.x.x" should
> > work AND make sure that you can run multicast over the link as well."
> Only
> > that "ping x.x.x.x should work."
> >
> > I missed 3 questions in where I met the scenario's requirements. I did
> miss
> > one legitamately, but one as opposed to 4 is the difference between pass
> > and fail.
> >
> > I am not sure what to do about this should I always infer that even if I
> > solve the problem described that there may be a hidden issue as well?
> >
> > Should I address this with Cisco360? I am a bit discouraged by this, as
> I
> > felt very confident about the material.
> >
> > Thanks for any insight people can share.
> >
> > Ed Vazquez
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 01 2013 - 10:53:57 ART