Re: Network Design

There is no way that rack is reaching 88 miles per hour ;)

Marc Edwards
CCIE #38259

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Karl Young <kaelwyoung_at_netscape.net> wrote:

> Joe,
> You forgot to include a Flux-capacitor in the layer 3 switch.
> Karl.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph L. Brunner <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>
> To: aaron1 <aaron1_at_gvtc.com>; Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco Fanatic <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com>; ccielab
> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sun, Mar 31, 2013 3:10 am
> Subject: RE: Network Design
>
>
> Easy!
>
> Just put a permit ip any any statement on any intermediary firewalls in all
> acl's as the first line, that are applied to all fw interfaces or on all
> routers...
>
> Then asymmetric packets are bound to make it through!
>
> Problem Solved, Design Validated
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> aaron1_at_gvtc.com
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 11:03 PM
> To: Tony Singh
> Cc: Cisco Fanatic; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Network Design
>
> How do you run dual L3 wan links with lan-side fhrp and maintain routing
> symmetry?
>
> ....and routing symmetry during fhrp failover...?
>
> Aaron
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com>
> To: Cisco Fanatic <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com>
> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Sent: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:54:24 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: Network Design
> is their a WAN that the 3945 connects to? does it run BGP?
> a good design IMO is something that has dual links & meshed to account for
> single link/device failure scenarios, but is engineered enough to ensure no
> asymmetric routing /. routing blackholes and routing loops, run FHRP
> consider
> that your inbound/outbound routing or east to west is tested prior to
> production
> if you have the 3750-x then get two this makes them stackable and one less
> problem should the single device fail BR Tony On 31 March 2013 03:44, Cisco
> Fanatic <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > My company hired a contractor who is a CCIE and I have learned some
> > good things from him. But, still one question which I am not able to
> > understand and can't get an answer for - What is considered a good
> > network design? The answer I always get is "it depends". Understand
> > that, so let me simplify in layman terms so that I can grasp the concept
> ...
> > What is recommended if say you have a router (say 3945), a switch (say
> > 6509) and access switches (3750x). How does this fit in "The Cisco
> > Three-Layered Hierarchical Model".
> > Should I consider 3945 as Core and 6509 as Distribution and configure
> > InterVLAN routing on the 6509, OR, it's the other way around?
> > -yuri
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 01 2013 - 08:09:16 ART