It appears that he has restrictions with using point-to-multipoint on the
spokes and is using physical interfaces on them also.
I have to ask. Why are you disabling inverse-ARP on the physical interface
when you don't have an IP address assigned to the physical interface?
-- Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice) bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com> INE, Inc. http://www.INE.com<http://www.ine.com/> From: Sunil Modi <sunil.s.modi_at_gmail.com<mailto:sunil.s.modi_at_gmail.com>> Date: Friday, March 8, 2013 5:07 PM To: Brian Dennis <bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com>> Cc: Daniel Barney Briseqo <daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com>>, Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<mailto:ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>> Subject: Re: Ospf Point-to-point to multipoint Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't the following work: R1 int ser0/0 enc fram no fram inv interface Serial0/0.124 multipoint ip address 172.16.124.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network point-to-multipoint frame-relay interface-dlci 102 frame-relay interface-dlci 105 end R1(config-router)#do sh ip ospf nei | i 124 172.16.124.5 0 FULL/ - 00:01:59 172.16.124.5 Serial0/0.124 172.16.124.2 0 FULL/ - 00:01:50 172.16.124.2 Serial0/0.124 R2 &R5 int ser0/0 enc frame rel no fram inv interface Serial0/0/0.124 point-to-point ip address 172.16.124.5 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network point-to-multipoint frame-relay interface-dlci 501 end R5(config-if)#do sh ip ospf nei Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 172.16.124.1 0 FULL/ - 00:01:39 172.16.124.1 Serial0/0/0.124 R5(config-router)#do sh ip route os 172.16.0.0/16<http://172.16.0.0/16> is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks O 172.16.124.1/32<http://172.16.124.1/32> [110/64] via 172.16.124.1, 00:00:59, Serial0/0/0.124 O 172.16.124.2/32<http://172.16.124.2/32> [110/128] via 172.16.124.1, 00:00:59, Serial0/0/0.124 On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Brian Dennis <bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com>> wrote: Could you just use PPPoFR? In your current configuration if you enter a "show ip route <remote spoke's FR INT IP>" from a spoke and it points directly to the interface and not the hub, then you'll need some sort of L3 to L2 mapping to reach the remote spoke. If you used OSPF Point-to-Multipoint on the spokes the route to reach the other spoke (/32 host route) would be via the hub as opposed to the directly connected interface as it is with the OSPF Point-to-Point network type. This is the reason you need a "mapping" on the spoke to reach the other spoke. Technically speaking OSPF Point-to-Multipoint is making the L3 topology in sync with the L2 topology by routing the spoke to spoke communication through the hub. OSPF Point-to-Multipoint is a "proper" solution by putting the L3 topology in sync with the L2 topology as opposed to a "hack" solution of PPPoFR or mapping the spoke's L3 address to the L2 address of the hub. -- Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice) bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com><mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdennis @ine.com>> INE, Inc. http://www.INE.com<http://www.ine.com/> From: Daniel Barney Briseqo <daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com><mailto:danie l.barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com>>> Date: Friday, March 8, 2013 11:29 AM To: Brian Dennis <bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com><mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdenni s_at_ine.com>>> Cc: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<mailto:ccielab_at_groupstudy.com><mailto:ccielab_at_groupst udy.com<mailto:ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>>> Subject: Re: Ospf Point-to-point to multipoint The lab I am doing is asking for that: - No frame relay maps between the spokes. - Spokes should be point to point using the physical interface, so i change the network type with ip ospf network and i set the timers to be equal with ip ospf hello-timers -hub must be multipoint. Ping with the hub works fine. From spoke to spoke, it is. Daniel Barney Briseqo "El zltimo minuto tambiin tiene 60 segundos" daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com><mailto:daniel .barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com>> On Mar 7, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Brian Dennis wrote: I'm assuming that your spokes are also multipoint (physical Frame Relay or multipoint subinterface) since you mentioned the spokes are not allowed the communicated directly. Is there a reason you don't have the spokes set to point-to-multipoint? Point-to-multipoint is designed to allow for reachability between the spokes without the need for mappings between spokes in the event the spokes are multipoint interfaces. -- Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice) bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com><mailto:bdennis_at_ine.com<mailto:bdennis @ine.com>> INE, Inc. http://www.INE.com On 3/7/13 4:53 PM, "Daniel Barney Briseqo" <daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com><mailto:danie l.barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com>>> wrote: Hello there. In this topology, over frame relay: R1-----------R2 | | R3 -I only have frame relay maps from, R1 to R2 and from R1 to R3. -Frame relay between the spokes is not allowed -The spokes must be ospf network type point-to-point and the hub multipoint. -I have changed the hello timers, so neighbors are UP. I have connectivity from hub to both spokes, but I dont have from spoke to spoke. Is this a split horizon issue? Rutes are being propagated well, I have announced the loopbacks on ospf and I can see all of them on each router. Daniel Barney Briseqo "El zltimo minuto tambiin tiene 60 segundos" daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com><mailto:daniel .barney.b_at_hotmail.com<mailto:daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Fri Mar 08 2013 - 16:18:14 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 03 2013 - 19:06:19 ART