Re: EIGRP with HSRP Question.

Please paste show ip route 192.168 .0 .0 from your wan router

HSRP is highest priority
On Feb 7, 2013 11:00 PM, "JB Poplawski" <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Both core routers/switches advertise the same subnet. WAN Router sees
> both routes, but prefers the higher IP (or so it seems).
>
> If I had 5 routers, highest IP wins, right? If that's the case, I need to
> get my primary HSRP/STP Switch to have the higher IP in the group.
>
> Trying to avoid any latency or additional hop in this solution.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:41 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Take advertisement off R1 and let it advertise all specific subnets in
>> 192.168. Hard to say what without knowing what is attempting to be
>> accomplished. When you say Router 2 leads the pack, I assume that this
>> is from the view of your WAN router?Again without knowing exactly what
>> is trying to be accomplished, if this is for lab or real design makes
>> it tough to validate any decisions. But I can guarantee that longest
>> prefix match will be the #1 routing selection and easiest to change by
>> simply removing R1's summary.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Johnny Morris <johnnymorris01_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > What is your IGP ? You wouldn't necessarily mess with HSRP to influence
>> an
>> > outbound route to a neighbor, You can use an offset-list for example
>> with
>> > EIGRP on the two routers facing the 3rd router and reference an ACL with
>> > the redistributed static route going to your third router. I would look
>> at
>> > the metric that is being received from both routers and offset it
>> depending
>> > on your IGP or routing protocol. For example of the route was received
>> with
>> > the same metric and you had two routes to get to the network you could
>> do
>> > the following with eigrp:
>> >
>> > An example would be
>> >
>> > R1
>> >
>> > router eigrp 1
>> >
>> > red static
>> >
>> > Offset- list 1 out 132000 INTERFACE
>> >
>> > access-list 1 p 192.168.0.0
>> >
>> > ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.x.x
>> >
>> >
>> > R2
>> >
>> > router eigrp 1
>> >
>> > red static
>> >
>> > Offset- list 1 out 132500 INTERFACE
>> >
>> > access-list 1 p 192.168.0.0
>> >
>> > ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.x.x
>> >
>> >
>> > Again depends on your routing protocol you are running between the
>> routers,
>> > because you mentioned Variance I assume you are running EIGRP.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Feb 7, 2013 6:23 PM, "JB Poplawski" <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Good afternoon,
>> >>
>> >> Have a scenario, it might be nit-picky, but figured I should ask.
>> >>
>> >> I have two routers running HSRP
>> >> HSRP VIP - 192.168.1.1
>> >> Router 1 Active - 192.168.1.2
>> >> Router 2 Standby - 192.168.1.3
>> >>
>> >> Both routers are redistributing static for a network summary.
>> >> 192.168.0.0/16
>> >>
>> >> I have an additional WAN router that comes in and is on that same
>> Layer 3
>> >> subnet.
>> >>
>> >> WAN - 192.168.1.10
>> >>
>> >> If I do a show ip route 192.168.0.0, I see both routers advertising the
>> >> summary, Router 2 is leading the pack for who owns that route. My
>> Router 1
>> >> is both the VIP holder AND STP root, though.
>> >>
>> >> What am I doing wrong? I assume I can add distance statement and drop
>> the
>> >> standby down a peg or two. Are there any cleaner ways? Drop variance
>> >> down?Any help is greatly appreciated.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> JB
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 07 2013 - 23:11:01 ART