Re: EIGRP with HSRP Question.

Longest prefix match always wins. Remove summary to reveal more
specific routes. Could be that simple or as complicated as you want to
make it.

Regards,

Marc

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:00 PM, JB Poplawski <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Both core routers/switches advertise the same subnet. WAN Router sees both
> routes, but prefers the higher IP (or so it seems).
>
> If I had 5 routers, highest IP wins, right? If that's the case, I need to
> get my primary HSRP/STP Switch to have the higher IP in the group.
>
> Trying to avoid any latency or additional hop in this solution.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:41 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Take advertisement off R1 and let it advertise all specific subnets in
>> 192.168. Hard to say what without knowing what is attempting to be
>> accomplished. When you say Router 2 leads the pack, I assume that this
>> is from the view of your WAN router?Again without knowing exactly what
>> is trying to be accomplished, if this is for lab or real design makes
>> it tough to validate any decisions. But I can guarantee that longest
>> prefix match will be the #1 routing selection and easiest to change by
>> simply removing R1's summary.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Johnny Morris <johnnymorris01_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > What is your IGP ? You wouldn't necessarily mess with HSRP to influence
>> > an
>> > outbound route to a neighbor, You can use an offset-list for example
>> > with
>> > EIGRP on the two routers facing the 3rd router and reference an ACL with
>> > the redistributed static route going to your third router. I would look
>> > at
>> > the metric that is being received from both routers and offset it
>> > depending
>> > on your IGP or routing protocol. For example of the route was received
>> > with
>> > the same metric and you had two routes to get to the network you could
>> > do
>> > the following with eigrp:
>> >
>> > An example would be
>> >
>> > R1
>> >
>> > router eigrp 1
>> >
>> > red static
>> >
>> > Offset- list 1 out 132000 INTERFACE
>> >
>> > access-list 1 p 192.168.0.0
>> >
>> > ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.x.x
>> >
>> >
>> > R2
>> >
>> > router eigrp 1
>> >
>> > red static
>> >
>> > Offset- list 1 out 132500 INTERFACE
>> >
>> > access-list 1 p 192.168.0.0
>> >
>> > ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.x.x
>> >
>> >
>> > Again depends on your routing protocol you are running between the
>> > routers,
>> > because you mentioned Variance I assume you are running EIGRP.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Feb 7, 2013 6:23 PM, "JB Poplawski" <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Good afternoon,
>> >>
>> >> Have a scenario, it might be nit-picky, but figured I should ask.
>> >>
>> >> I have two routers running HSRP
>> >> HSRP VIP - 192.168.1.1
>> >> Router 1 Active - 192.168.1.2
>> >> Router 2 Standby - 192.168.1.3
>> >>
>> >> Both routers are redistributing static for a network summary.
>> >> 192.168.0.0/16
>> >>
>> >> I have an additional WAN router that comes in and is on that same Layer
>> >> 3
>> >> subnet.
>> >>
>> >> WAN - 192.168.1.10
>> >>
>> >> If I do a show ip route 192.168.0.0, I see both routers advertising the
>> >> summary, Router 2 is leading the pack for who owns that route. My
>> >> Router 1
>> >> is both the VIP holder AND STP root, though.
>> >>
>> >> What am I doing wrong? I assume I can add distance statement and drop
>> >> the
>> >> standby down a peg or two. Are there any cleaner ways? Drop variance
>> >> down?Any help is greatly appreciated.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> JB
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 07 2013 - 21:13:38 ART