Re: EIGRP with HSRP Question.

Both core routers/switches advertise the same subnet. WAN Router sees both
routes, but prefers the higher IP (or so it seems).

If I had 5 routers, highest IP wins, right? If that's the case, I need to
get my primary HSRP/STP Switch to have the higher IP in the group.

Trying to avoid any latency or additional hop in this solution.

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:41 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Take advertisement off R1 and let it advertise all specific subnets in
> 192.168. Hard to say what without knowing what is attempting to be
> accomplished. When you say Router 2 leads the pack, I assume that this
> is from the view of your WAN router?Again without knowing exactly what
> is trying to be accomplished, if this is for lab or real design makes
> it tough to validate any decisions. But I can guarantee that longest
> prefix match will be the #1 routing selection and easiest to change by
> simply removing R1's summary.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marc
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Johnny Morris <johnnymorris01_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > What is your IGP ? You wouldn't necessarily mess with HSRP to influence
> an
> > outbound route to a neighbor, You can use an offset-list for example with
> > EIGRP on the two routers facing the 3rd router and reference an ACL with
> > the redistributed static route going to your third router. I would look
> at
> > the metric that is being received from both routers and offset it
> depending
> > on your IGP or routing protocol. For example of the route was received
> with
> > the same metric and you had two routes to get to the network you could do
> > the following with eigrp:
> >
> > An example would be
> >
> > R1
> >
> > router eigrp 1
> >
> > red static
> >
> > Offset- list 1 out 132000 INTERFACE
> >
> > access-list 1 p 192.168.0.0
> >
> > ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.x.x
> >
> >
> > R2
> >
> > router eigrp 1
> >
> > red static
> >
> > Offset- list 1 out 132500 INTERFACE
> >
> > access-list 1 p 192.168.0.0
> >
> > ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.x.x
> >
> >
> > Again depends on your routing protocol you are running between the
> routers,
> > because you mentioned Variance I assume you are running EIGRP.
> >
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2013 6:23 PM, "JB Poplawski" <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Good afternoon,
> >>
> >> Have a scenario, it might be nit-picky, but figured I should ask.
> >>
> >> I have two routers running HSRP
> >> HSRP VIP - 192.168.1.1
> >> Router 1 Active - 192.168.1.2
> >> Router 2 Standby - 192.168.1.3
> >>
> >> Both routers are redistributing static for a network summary.
> >> 192.168.0.0/16
> >>
> >> I have an additional WAN router that comes in and is on that same Layer
> 3
> >> subnet.
> >>
> >> WAN - 192.168.1.10
> >>
> >> If I do a show ip route 192.168.0.0, I see both routers advertising the
> >> summary, Router 2 is leading the pack for who owns that route. My
> Router 1
> >> is both the VIP holder AND STP root, though.
> >>
> >> What am I doing wrong? I assume I can add distance statement and drop
> the
> >> standby down a peg or two. Are there any cleaner ways? Drop variance
> >> down?Any help is greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> JB
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 07 2013 - 22:00:23 ART