What Cisco calls the TE metric is what I believe Juniper calls the LSP metric. The key is that there is an IGP metric for the link and a separately configurable TE metric. If you want to change the TE tunnel's cost but not affect IGP you have that option. Normally the TE metric is inherited from the IGP metric, but you can manually change it with the "mpls traffic-eng administrative-weight" command.
See the following:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_te_cfg_path_calc.html
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP/Security)
bmcgahan_at_INE.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.INE.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of shekhar sharma
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:36 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: diffrnece b/w Te-metric & LSP metric
Hi All,
I have been working on MPLS traffic engineering and concepts like forwarding adjaency these days.
I am confused on the diffrence b/w Te-metric & LSP metric and how,when,where to manipulate them.
If anyone can share some docs or links that will be helpful.or if can explain to me
thanks,
Shekhar
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 07 2013 - 18:07:42 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 01 2013 - 07:57:58 ART