Re: EIGRP with HSRP Question.

I would suggest that what you are doing wrong is mixing your layer 2 and
layer 3 routing. Why are you letting spanning tree come into a layer 3
routing decision? Your HSRP is to provide clients (hosts, other devices)
that don't speak routing protocols a way to have multiple paths out, it
shouldn't be factored into the decision process for devices that speak the
same routing protocol.

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:22 PM, JB Poplawski <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Good afternoon,
>
> Have a scenario, it might be nit-picky, but figured I should ask.
>
> I have two routers running HSRP
> HSRP VIP - 192.168.1.1
> Router 1 Active - 192.168.1.2
> Router 2 Standby - 192.168.1.3
>
> Both routers are redistributing static for a network summary.
> 192.168.0.0/16
>
> I have an additional WAN router that comes in and is on that same Layer 3
> subnet.
>
> WAN - 192.168.1.10
>
> If I do a show ip route 192.168.0.0, I see both routers advertising the
> summary, Router 2 is leading the pack for who owns that route. My Router 1
> is both the VIP holder AND STP root, though.
>
> What am I doing wrong? I assume I can add distance statement and drop the
> standby down a peg or two. Are there any cleaner ways? Drop variance
> down?Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> JB
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Marc Abel
CCIE #35470
(Routing and Switching)
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net