Thanks Brian/Lindsay
-MSDP
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Brian Dennis <bdennis_at_ine.com> wrote:
> Do not advertise networks into a protocol unless you are instructed to do
> so by the lab. It could be explicitly mentioned (i.e. advertise R1's
> Loopback0 interface into BGP) or implicitly mentioned (R1's Loopback0
> should be reachable via BGP on R5) as to what to advertise. Note that all
> routers may not have reachability to all BGP advertised networks. It'll
> be relatively clear in the lab as to what they want or don't want
> advertised by a protocol.
>
> --
> Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice)
> bdennis_at_ine.com
>
> INE, Inc.
> http://www.INE.com
>
>
>
> On 12/14/12 3:47 PM, "MSDP multicast" <multicast100_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Experts,
> >
> >When I practice on online racks, i always add "redist connected" in BGP so
> >that when I do end-to-end connectivity tests, I don't have to put 'source
> >loo0'.
> >
> >ping 100.100.100.1 source loop0
> >
> >
> >router ospf 100
> > network x.x.x.x.
> >
> >router bgp 100
> >add ipv4 uni
> >redist connected
> >redist ospf 100
> >
> >
> >For the lab exam purpose do you think we can use 'redistribute connected'
> >and won't loose mark?
> >
> >What has your experience been?
> >
> >In most workbook, vendor just says make sure after this task <this> should
> >b able to ping with <this>. What normally do they expect, - with source
> >interface or without source interface?
> >
> >
> >Thank you.
> >
> >-msdp
> >
> >
> >Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Dec 15 2012 - 14:43:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 01 2013 - 09:36:53 ART