Re: redistribute connected in exam

From: Brian Dennis <bdennis_at_ine.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:20:32 -0600

Do not advertise networks into a protocol unless you are instructed to do
so by the lab. It could be explicitly mentioned (i.e. advertise R1's
Loopback0 interface into BGP) or implicitly mentioned (R1's Loopback0
should be reachable via BGP on R5) as to what to advertise. Note that all
routers may not have reachability to all BGP advertised networks. It'll
be relatively clear in the lab as to what they want or don't want
advertised by a protocol.

-- 
Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice)
bdennis_at_ine.com
INE, Inc.
http://www.INE.com 
On 12/14/12 3:47 PM, "MSDP multicast" <multicast100_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>Experts,
>
>When I practice on online racks, i always add "redist connected" in BGP so
>that when I do end-to-end connectivity tests, I don't have to put 'source
>loo0'.
>
>ping 100.100.100.1 source loop0
>
>
>router ospf 100
> network x.x.x.x.
>
>router bgp 100
>add ipv4 uni
>redist connected
>redist ospf 100
>
>
>For the lab exam purpose do you think we can use 'redistribute connected'
>and won't loose mark?
>
>What has your experience been?
>
>In most workbook, vendor just says make sure after this task <this> should
>b able to ping with <this>.  What normally do they expect, - with source
>interface or without source interface?
>
>
>Thank you.
>
>-msdp
>
>
>Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Dec 14 2012 - 18:20:32 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 01 2013 - 09:36:53 ART