Hi Tom
I was also with the same confusion as like you after finishing my R&S. But
now after purchasing Narbik Workbooks and INE materials for CCIE SPV3. I
felt they have covered the blueprint extensively. So i would recommend to
go for Narbik and INE WB if you want to pursue your SPV3.
I am doing the same right now.
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Now that I'm done with CCIE R&S, there is a void in my evenings, no more
> date-nights with R1 and SW2 (oh memories) or practice labs. So I was
> thinking of looking at the CCIE Service Provider. I wanted to get some
> feedback from people that did their RS and moved on to the Service Provider
> track. From my initial research I'm noticing that workbooks don't seem to
> be comprehensive as with RS, by that I mean not all topics are covered in
> them (I could be wrong). Is that partly due to the hardware requirements?
> What sort of major difference did you noticed studying SPv3 vs RS in terms
> of materials and preparation?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom Kacprzynski
> CCIE#36159
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Problems arise because we talk,problems are not solved because we don't talk So good or bad talk to your affectionate one's freely. Yours Friendly, H P HEMANTH RAJ CCIE#28593 (R&S) Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Oct 23 2012 - 07:01:00 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 01 2012 - 10:53:33 ART