Isn't QinQ point to point and VPLS is point to multipoint ?
-Torleif
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] Pe vegne av Brian
McGahan
Sendt: 9. oktober 2012 19:26
Til: vishal bhugra; CCIE GroupStudy
Emne: RE: Difference between services provided by Q-in-Q and VPLS.
Q-in-Q is an Ethernet VPN. VPLS is an Ethernet over MPLS VPN. From a high
level overview they basically do the same thing, which is to create an
emulated LAN over the SP network, but in general VPLS is more scalable and
manageable than Q-in-Q.
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP/Security) bmcgahan_at_INE.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.INE.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
vishal bhugra
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 6:01 AM
To: Online Study List; CCIE GroupStudy
Subject: Difference between services provided by Q-in-Q and VPLS.
Hello Experts
Today I started studying VPLS and got confused.
Can you please help me, in clarifying the difference between services
provided by Q-in-Q and VPLS.
-- Thanks®ards Vishal Best way to predict the future ..... is to create it Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Oct 09 2012 - 22:37:21 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 01 2012 - 10:53:33 ART