RE: Load Balancers

Let me be clear by stating that I'm not defending CCIE KID but I'm
really shocked to see how the community reacts when someone fat fingers
a number. I honestly expected better from this community.

I'm 100% sure everyone on this groupstudy list has fat fingered a
number rather it be an ip address, as number, phone number or whatever.

Last time I checked Cisco Load balancers such as the ACE are not
covered on the CCIE Security or the CCIE Voice track, they are however
listed in the blueprint of the new CCIE Data Center track.

With that beign said, the most you can expect from him is to google his
question in which case hes going to find a bunch of blogs written by
cisco and f5 fans bashing each other over who is better.

None the less, no one has answered his question and that is the very
point of this group study.

-Matthew George

On 08/29/2012 02:49 PM, Ryan West wrote:
> And your name and your track.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of JB Poplawski
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:42 PM
> To: Ray
> Cc: Networking guru; Sidney D'Souza; Imran Ali; Gaurav Thukral;
> Nathan Richie; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Load Balancers
>
> Ha!
>
> I know when I get my number, the first thing I'm going to do is
> forget. my.
> number.
>
> JB
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Ray <rtvrpk_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is it again some typo'ss?
>>
>> Just googled the number!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Networking guru
>> <eliteccie_at_gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hey Guys
>> >
>> > My number is CCIE#29993 and not CCIE#29992 . It was a typo guys
>> > Holycrap!! How many people bashing me ...
>> > A small mistake in signature took my breath away Phew!!!
>> >
>> >
>> > *Name*
>> >
>> > *Certification Type*
>> >
>> > *Certification Number*
>> >
>> > *Track*
>> >
>> > *Certification Status*
>> >
>> > *Certification Date*
>> >
>> > AKRAM KHAN
>> >
>> > CCIE****
>> >
>> > 29993**
>> >
>> > Security
>> >
>> > Re-certified****
>> >
>> > 25-Aug-2011****
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Sidney D'Souza
>> > <mail.sidney_at_gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > I contacted guy who the number belongs to and he said he does
>> not
>> > > use
>> the
>> > > alias CCIE KID. So it can only mean, that CCIE Kid has made a
>> typo
>> > > with
>> > his
>> > > number or is upto something fishy.****
>> > >
>> > > ** **
>> > >
>> > > Regards,****
>> > >
>> > > Sid****
>> > >
>> > > Nobody's really listening, until you make a mistake...****
>> > >
>> > > ** **
>> > >
>> > > *From:* Imran Ali [mailto:immrccie_at_gmail.com]
>> > > *Sent:* 29 August 2012 21:34
>> > > *To:* Gaurav Thukral
>> > > *Cc:* Sidney D'Souza; Nathan Richie; CCIE KID; Cisco
>> certification
>> > > *Subject:* Re: Load Balancers****
>> > >
>> > > ** **
>> > >
>> > > i too raised the same question (unicast) months ago but he
>> seems
>> > > to
>> > have
>> > > no answer. ****
>> > >
>> > > ****
>> > >
>> > > i guess he will sign up with a diff account now !****
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ****
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Gaurav Thukral
>> > > <pearlgaurav_at_gmail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:****
>> > >
>> > > Hi Sidney
>> > >
>> > > I think CCIE KID has no answer.
>> > >
>> > > Gaurav Thukral
>> > > CCIE # 21156 ( R&S , SP)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Sent from my iPhone ignore my typos****
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 29-Aug-2012, at 9:17 PM, "Sidney D'Souza"
>> > > <mail.sidney_at_gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I think CCIE kid has some explaining to do!!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > CCIE/CCDE Verification Tool
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > CCIE/CCDE Certification Details
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Name
>> > > >
>> > > > Certification Type
>> > > >
>> > > > Certification Number
>> > > >
>> > > > Track
>> > > >
>> > > > Certification Status
>> > > >
>> > > > Certification Date
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > BALAMURUGAN SINGARAM
>> > > >
>> > > > CCIE
>> > > >
>> > > > 29992
>> > > >
>> > > > Voice
>> > > >
>> > > > Re-certified
>> > > >
>> > > > 24-Aug-2011
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Sid
>> > > >
>> > > > Nobody's really listening, until you make a mistake...
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>> > > > Behalf
>> > Of
>> > > > Nathan Richie
>> > > > Sent: 29 August 2012 18:31
>> > > > To: CCIE KID; Cisco certification
>> > > > Subject: RE: Load Balancers
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > CCIE KID,
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Curiosity killed the cat and got the best of me today. After
>> > conducting
>> > > a
>> > > > Google search on your number and finding a name associated
>> with
>> > > > that
>> > > number
>> > > > on various sites (linkedin.com, as well as several training
>> > > > vendors
>> > > claiming
>> > > > that you used their material to pass). I took the name from
>> > linked.comand
>> > > > the CCIE number and ran it through the CCIE Verification tool
>> on
>> > Cisco's
>> > > > website. Unfortunately, either all the sites have your name
>> > > > spelled incorrectly (a distinct possibility) OR Cisco is not
>> > > > recognizing you
>> > as
>> > > a
>> > > > CCIE (see the output below):
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > CCIE/CCDE Verification Tool
>> > > >
>> > > > No, I'm sorry, Bala Singaram is not CCIE number 29992. To
>> > > > receive a
>> > > positive
>> > > > verification, you will need to enter in the CCIE's name
>> exactly
>> > > > as it
>> > is
>> > > in
>> > > > the CCIE database. For example, if the CCIE's first name is
>> Dan,
>> > > > you
>> > may
>> > > > also want to try Daniel. Since there is a possibility that we
>> > > > have a different spelling of the person's name, please contact
>> > > > Cisco
>> > > Certifications
>> > > > Online Support as a last resort.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Could you please clarify for those that might be wondering,
>> are
>> > > > you a
>> > > CCIE?
>> > > > I find it rather odd that your signature line only says CCIE
>> KID
>> > instead
>> > > of
>> > > > your real name.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Nathan Richie
>> > > >
>> > > > CCIE#27910
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > >
>> > > > From: <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> nobody_at_groupstudy.com [
>> > > > <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com]
>> On
>> Behalf
>> > > Of
>> > > > CCIE KID
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:11 AM
>> > > >
>> > > > To: Cisco certification
>> > > >
>> > > > Subject: OT: Load Balancers
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi all
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I want to implement Load Balancers in my customer network. I
>> > > > need to
>> > know
>> > > > about different types of Load Balancers and also want to
>> know
>> > > > how
>> > each
>> > > one
>> > > > works.
>> > > >
>> > > > I am new to load balancing world. I heard of CISCO ACE and F5
>> .
>> > > > Can
>> > > someone
>> > > > point me in how each Load balancers work or else any real time
>> > > > advice
>> > in
>> > > > choosing Load Balancers
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Can anyone share any real time implementation experience in
>> Load
>> > > Balancers.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Is there any doc for ACE to read about ?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > With Warmest Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > CCIE KID
>> > > >
>> > > > CCIE#29992 (Security)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Blogs and organic groups at <http://www.ccie.net>
>> http://www.ccie.net
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _
>> > > >
>> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > >
>> > > > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Blogs and organic groups at <http://www.ccie.net>
>> http://www.ccie.net
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _
>> > > >
>> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > >
>> > > > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > > >
>> > > >
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _
>> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >
>> > >
>> __________________________________________________________________
>> > > _____ Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ****
>> > >
>> > > ** **
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > With Warmest Regards,
>> >
>> > CCIE KID
>> > CCIE#29992 (Security)
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> >
>> ____________________________________________________________________
>> > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _ Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 29 2012 - 15:14:54 ART