RE: Load Balancers

By all means, feel free to waste your time then. The user has lied about the number twice, hardly a fat finger.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of mgeorge_at_geores.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:15 PM
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Load Balancers

Let me be clear by stating that I'm not defending CCIE KID but I'm really shocked to see how the community reacts when someone fat fingers a number. I honestly expected better from this community.

I'm 100% sure everyone on this groupstudy list has fat fingered a number rather it be an ip address, as number, phone number or whatever.

Last time I checked Cisco Load balancers such as the ACE are not covered on the CCIE Security or the CCIE Voice track, they are however listed in the blueprint of the new CCIE Data Center track.

With that beign said, the most you can expect from him is to google his question in which case hes going to find a bunch of blogs written by cisco and f5 fans bashing each other over who is better.

None the less, no one has answered his question and that is the very point of this group study.

-Matthew George

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 29 2012 - 19:23:17 ART