Re: QOS Priority

MAX reserve bandwidth is gone in newer platfarms specially with GIGE

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
<joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>wrote:

> Your describing the "bandwidth" command - which does NOT have a built-in
> policer; the priority command does.
>
> Check this link -
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk757/technologies_tech_note09186a0080103eae.shtml
>
> don't forget the interface command - "max-reserved-bandwidth"
>
> thanks
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> sameer khan
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:53 AM
> To: groupstudy
> Subject: QOS Priority
>
> Hey
>
> I need some clarification on the following, as far as i have understood
> it, the policy-map will or should only apply when the interface is facing
> congestion, but i can still see ping being limited to 8kbps. By the way i
> am testing it in Gns3
>
> Thanks
>
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
> speed 100
> full-duplex
> service-policy output smtp
>
>
> class-map match-all myclass
> match access-group 105
> !
> !
> policy-map mymap
> class myclass
> priority 8
>
>
>
> access-list 105 permit icmp any any
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Aug 27 2012 - 22:46:28 ART