Re: What does 'show ip eigrp topology x.x.x.x/x' actually show?

I believe that when you specify a prefix like you're doing, it will
show you all learned routes including those that do not pass the
feasibility condition.

John

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:07 AM, dia.aliou_at_gmail.com
<dia.aliou_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> here is my output:
>
> R1#sh ip eigrp topology 22.22.22.22/32
> IP-EIGRP (AS 1): Topology entry for 22.22.22.22/32
> State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 2297856
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> 192.168.12.2 (Serial0/0), from 192.168.12.2, Send flag is 0x0
> Composite metric is (2297856/128256), Route is Internal
> Vector metric:
> Minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
> Total delay is 25000 microseconds
> Reliability is 255/255
> Load is 1/255
> Minimum MTU is 1500
> Hop count is 1
> 192.168.13.3 (Serial0/1), from 192.168.13.3, Send flag is 0x0
> Composite metric is (2809856/2297856), Route is Internal
> Vector metric:
> Minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
> Total delay is 45000 microseconds
> Reliability is 255/255
> Load is 1/255
> Minimum MTU is 1500
> Hop count is 2
> R1#
>
>
> Same behavior.
>
>
> On 10 August 2012 01:05, dia.aliou_at_gmail.com <dia.aliou_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry I didnt check well, had some variance and delay configs.
>>
>>
>> On 10 August 2012 00:39, Keller Giacomarro <keller.g_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Good thought on variance, but I do not have it configured.
>>>
>>> R3(config-router)#do show ver | inc 12.4
>>> Cisco IOS Software, C2600 Software (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version
>>> 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
>>> R3(config-router)#do show run | inc variance
>>> R3(config-router)#
>>>
>>> I'm also pretty sure it's not an artifact from my setup, as the output
>>> I pasted was directly out of the solution guide!
>>>
>>> Keller Giacomarro
>>> keller.g_at_gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:35 AM, dia.aliou_at_gmail.com
>>> <dia.aliou_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Keller,
>>> > Which IOS version are you using?
>>> > Just tested in 12.4T, I only see feasible successor when I use the below
>>> > command.
>>> > I would guess you have variance configured under eigrp.
>>> >
>>> > /Aliou
>>> >
>>> > On 10 August 2012 00:07, Keller Giacomarro <keller.g_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Okay, pretty stumped here.
>>> >>
>>> >> R3#show ip eigrp topology 150.1.7.0 255.255.255.0
>>> >> IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 150.1.7.0/24
>>> >> State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 128256
>>> >> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>>> >> 155.1.37.7 (FastEthernet0/0), from 155.1.37.7, Send flag is 0x0
>>> >> Composite metric is (128256/128000), Route is Internal
>>> >> Vector metric:
>>> >> Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit
>>> >> Total delay is 5010 microseconds
>>> >> Reliability is 255/255
>>> >> Load is 1/255
>>> >> Minimum MTU is 1500
>>> >> Hop count is 1
>>> >> 155.1.0.5 (Serial1/0.1), from 155.1.0.5, Send flag is 0x0
>>> >> Composite metric is (1152512/640512), Route is Internal
>>> >> Vector metric:
>>> >> Minimum bandwidth is 128 Kbit
>>> >> Total delay is 45020 microseconds
>>> >> Reliability is 255/255
>>> >> Load is 1/255
>>> >>
>>> >> I thought that 'show ip eigrp topo x.x.x.x/x' showed successors and
>>> >> feasible successors only. But the second entry above shows an AD of
>>> >> 640512, which is larger than the FD of 128256. Is this considered a
>>> >> Feasible Successor or not? If not, what's it doing in this command
>>> >> output?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks as always!
>>> >>
>>> >> Keller Giacomarro
>>> >> keller.g_at_gmail.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Aug 10 2012 - 08:32:21 ART