Re: OSPF Multi-hop, running bgp without ip address on physical

Thank you very much , will try out.

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:47 PM, me you <anunda19_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> What type of bridge gourp should you use to accomplish this. I tried with
> no ip add on R2 and a CMF bridge but I created a nice loop with the
> switches inbetween the routers. An IRB bridge does not seem right because I
> am not using IP's on R2. should I use IP's on R2? With a CRB bridge I can
> only use IP as the protocal. That might be the way to go. Any Hints!
>
> Thanks
> Rob
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe bridge groups are in the right path.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Joe Sanchez
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2012, at 11:13 PM, Rahul Kulkarni <
>> kulkarni.rahul.2483_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I have two questions
>> > 1. R1(OSPF)-----------R2-----------R3(OSPF)
>> >
>> > R1 and R3 are running ospf and R2 is not running it, is it possible to
>> R1
>> > and R3 to form adj.
>> > (don't suggest tunneling )
>> >
>> > 2. (loopback0)R1[e0/0]------------------[e0/0]R2(loopback0)
>> >
>> > Both the routers run bgp using their loopback as the neighbor and update
>> > source
>> > but the physical interfaces doesn't have any ip address, are the routers
>> > will be neighbors?
>> > (no ip unnumbered)
>> >
>> > Please reply.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> >
>> > Rahul Kulkarni
>> > +91-9923030077
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Best Regards,
Rahul Kulkarni
+91-9923030077
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net