Re: Question with mpls layer 3 vpn.

It sounds like you are talking about Inter-AS option C?

If you are doing Inter-AS VPN, you can exchange labels for the PE
looppbacks via SAFI 4, which means your IPV4 routes can include
labels. But the LSP from your PE to ASBR is still going to be signaled
via LDP ( or RSVP).

 I'm a little confused about what you're trying to accomplish. Does
this answer your question?

-Yuri

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:03 AM, rakesh madupu <raaki.88_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have a question with mpls layer 3 vpn. I have been reading layer 3 vpns
> and been implementing them with the help of Mpls. As many of you are aware
> that mpls provides transport label over the vpn label in the P routers.
>
> Now , I have been reading on implementing bgp to advertise labels for
> routes ? family inet labeled-unicast
> Can any one of you shed me some light on my understanding below
>
> 1. Can I use this specific address family in order to advertise labels
> 2. I have read and used this particular family in CoC and InterAs options.
> 3. My question is purely with respect to replacing the Lsp from one pe to
> remote pe by Mpls and use Bgp for transport ?
> 4. Am i missing something which is very basic? Please guide me if so
>
> Have a great weekend.
>
>
> --
> Any Fool can Know The Point is to Understand - Einstein
>
> www.cciematrix.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jun 16 2012 - 15:38:29 ART