RE: Peer Neighbor Route

Why would you ever need to have /32 network of your neighbor ppp interface in your routing table?

Marcin Zgola | Netrix, LLC | 847.283.7400 |(Direct) 847.283.7328| (fax) 847.283.7610 | http://www.netrixllc.com/
Internetwork Lead | CCIE# 18676 (Security)

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Tay
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 8:20 PM
To: Arista Wirawan
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Peer Neighbor Route

Hi Arista,

Tested. It works perfect by removing the peer neighbor-route. However, if to use ip address negotiable, peer neighbour will be needed. Is there any ways to overcome this as removing the peer neighbor-route is not an option anymore?

Regards

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Arista Wirawan <aristaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> The peer neighbor-route command on the interface serial with ppp
> encapsulation will add the /32 route of the other end router.
>
> Try no peer neighbor-route both end, shut and mo shut.. those
> additional
> /32 route will be gone..
>
> Aris
> CCIE #35534
> Sent from my HTC
>
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Vincent Tay" <vtay.75_at_gmail.com>
> To: "Ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Peer Neighbor Route
> Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 11:49 PM
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have some issue with peer neighbor route.
>
> Network Setup
> EIGRP Domain
> ________________________
> |
> |
> |
> |
> OSPF 2 | OSPF 1 |
> R4
> ------------PPPoE-----------------R3-------------------------------R2
>
>
> R3 has three routes as below once the PPPoE has been setup.
>
> C 5.5.34.3/32 is directly connected, Dialer1
> O 5.5.34.0/24 [110/1786] via 5.5.34.4, 00:14:17
> C 5.5.34.4/32 is directly connected, Dialer1
>
> However on R2, it has only two routes as below.
>
> O IA 5.5.34.3/32 [110/1849] via 5.5.23.3, 00:14:13, Serial0/1
> O IA 5.5.34.0/24 [110/1850] via 5.5.23.3, 00:14:13, Serial0/1
>
> The ospf network statement is correct using "network 5.5.34.0
> 0.0.0.255 area 2" on R3. My question is what happen to 5.5.34.4 route.
> It should appear in R2 as interarea routes right. Another question is
> once i perform mutual redistribution on R3 and R2, i receive
> 5.5.34.4/32 as external routes. Puzzled.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 31 2012 - 01:47:42 ART