we do not need peer neighbor-route on ip address negotiated as long as we
have routing protocol configured. .
once we remove this peer neighbor-route command (on ip unnumbered ), then
we can cannot ping the ip address of the other end. But not to worry,
enable routing protocols, such as ospf will and it find a way to perform
the adjency then we can see the routes again (NOT in /32 but the actual
subnet mask)
for example
R1
int loopback 0
ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
int s0/0
encap ppp
ip unnumbered loopback 0
no peer neighbor-route
sh
no sh
router ospf 1
net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 a 0
R2
int loopback 0
ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
int s0/0
encap ppp
ip unnumbered loopback 0
no peer neighbor-route
sh
no sh
router ospf 1
net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 a 0
The ospf routing protocols will still works perfectly
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Vincent Tay <vtay.75_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Arista,
>
> Tested. It works perfect by removing the peer neighbor-route. However, if
> to use ip address negotiable, peer neighbour will be needed. Is there any
> ways to overcome this as removing the peer neighbor-route is not an option
> anymore?
>
> Regards
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Arista Wirawan <aristaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The peer neighbor-route command on the interface serial with ppp
>> encapsulation will add the /32 route of the other end router.
>>
>> Try no peer neighbor-route both end, shut and mo shut.. those additional
>> /32 route will be gone..
>>
>> Aris
>> CCIE #35534
>> Sent from my HTC
>>
>>
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Vincent Tay" <vtay.75_at_gmail.com>
>> To: "Ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Subject: Peer Neighbor Route
>> Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 11:49 PM
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have some issue with peer neighbor route.
>>
>> Network Setup
>> EIGRP Domain
>> ________________________
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> OSPF 2 | OSPF 1 |
>> R4 ------------PPPoE-----------------R3-------------------------------R2
>>
>>
>> R3 has three routes as below once the PPPoE has been setup.
>>
>> C 5.5.34.3/32 is directly connected, Dialer1
>> O 5.5.34.0/24 [110/1786] via 5.5.34.4, 00:14:17
>> C 5.5.34.4/32 is directly connected, Dialer1
>>
>> However on R2, it has only two routes as below.
>>
>> O IA 5.5.34.3/32 [110/1849] via 5.5.23.3, 00:14:13, Serial0/1
>> O IA 5.5.34.0/24 [110/1850] via 5.5.23.3, 00:14:13, Serial0/1
>>
>> The ospf network statement is correct using "network 5.5.34.0 0.0.0.255
>> area 2" on R3. My question is what happen to 5.5.34.4 route. It should
>> appear in R2 as interarea routes right. Another question is once i perform
>> mutual redistribution on R3 and R2, i receive 5.5.34.4/32 as external
>> routes. Puzzled.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 31 2012 - 09:49:08 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 17 2012 - 09:04:20 ART