You are probably right. Good thing I didn't say "Zork". They'd probably
think I was cussing...
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 5/24/2012 11:25 AM, Scott Morris wrote:
> You may have lost more of them at "Duke Nukem" rather than IPX. :)
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> CCDE #2009::D, CCNP-Voice, JNCIE-SP #153, JNCIE-ER #102, CISSP, et al.
>
> IPv6 Gold Certified Engineer, IPv6 Gold Certified Trainer
>
> CCSI #21903, JNCI-SP, JNCI-ER
>
> swm_at_emanon.com
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
> On 5/24/12 8:08 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
>> Seriously?
>>
>> Yes. Openflow is pretty cool. So is fabric path. So is OTV. So is blah
>> blah blah. I'm not going to be the guy who says "openflow is a fad"
>> because I don't think that's true. But I am pretty sure my job is safe
>> even at an escalated adoption rate of the technology. The reason us
>> "CLI monkeys" make a little more than an MCSE or an RHCE or a Desktop
>> Support Representative is because we understand the technology. And
>> that understanding of a complicated world is what separates us. That's
>> why you get called in to troubleshoot other peoples problems. Other
>> folks who are "experts" in their field. That's why you laugh when a
>> server admin calls himself an "architect" on his sig line. That's why
>> you are the go to guy. It's not whether you've adopted a particular
>> technology or not. It's whether you are a competent resource who
>> UNDERSTANDS the technology. Routers and Switches probably won't go
>> away before you retire. They may change roles and protocols but I
>> doubt they will go away. How else can we play Duke Nukem over IPX?
>>
>> PS: If you don't understand that last sentence I forgive you for being
>> young. IPX is a protocol. Not a training company.
>>
>> -Hammer-
>>
>> "I was a normal American nerd"
>> -Jack Herer
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/24/2012 4:05 AM, MSDP multicast wrote:
>>> Tony - what did you get out of this blog post?
>>> I don't know if I am going on the right path here doing R&S.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Tony Singh<mothafungla_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great blog man!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> BR
>>>>
>>>> Tony CCNP CCNA R&S JNCIS-SEC MCSEu get
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone on 3
>>>>
>>>> On 23 May 2012, at 13:25, MSDP multicast<multicast100_at_gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hello people,
>>>>> Looks like someone posted about next big move in networking world.
>>>>> My question is, should I study R&S or I should move into application
>>>> world
>>>>> more?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> http://bhatkoti.com/2012/05/23/why-should-a-network-engineer-move-into-an-app-space/
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you people.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 24 2012 - 12:16:27 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 17 2012 - 09:04:20 ART