Jay, shouldn't you be sipping fruit drinks and laying on the beach?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>wrote:
> I hate to ask again, but is there a network diagram of this to better
> explain?
>
> The hardware platform would only facilitate speed, options, and hardware
> WIC's.
>
> From there, we can better assist.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jay McMickle- CCIE
> #35355
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Lucky
> <iamreallylucky_at_gmail.com>
> To: Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>
> Cc:
> "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012
> 5:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Cisco 1841
>
> After a long I am reply for this, since the
> need has arised to sort out
> this ...
>
> need help on this
>
> OPtion 1 -
>
> I am
> thinking to have additional HWIC slot for the router and configure it
> so that
> from router 1 interface for wan link, 2 interface for lan - (from
> which 1
> interface will go to one firewall for one tunnel) - from 2nd lan
> interface
> will go to second firewall for second tunnel.
>
> OPtion 2
>
> I should upgrade...
> an 1841 by getting - 3900 series router and do the
> consiguration
>
> once i get
> the card and insert I need help in the configuration changes -
>
> what i need to
> do inorder to configure adsl router so that from router 1
> interface for wan
> link, 2 interface for lan - (from which 1 interface will
> go to one firewall
> for one tunnel) - from 2nd lan interface will go to
> second firewall for second
> tunnel.
>
> Total 16 wan ips i have.
>
> I Need help on a sample configuration - on
> how this can be achieved.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Jay McMickle
> <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > So, the CP FW is the outer facing edge,
> where the NAT occurs, and the 1841
> > is the VPN termination point?
> >
> >
> >
> Regards,
> > Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
> > Sent from iJay
> >
> > On Apr 3, 2012,
> at 11:47 PM, Lucky <iamreallylucky_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks jay,
> > to be
> more precise ,
> > currently two ports in 1841 are already used for nat inside
> and outside
> > and it gets terminated at production network through checkpoint
> firewall -
> > this has an existing tunnel to london. I want to create another
> tunnel to
> > london without disturbing the existing network and put another
> port in 1841.
> >
> > in the 1841 i want to insert another card with ethernet
> port, configure
> > so that i can connect to another firewal and create my
> tunnel- is this
> > possible
> > is it possible for the 1841 to handle this
> >
> right now only two ports are there in 1841 and already used for nat
> > inside,
> outside , so the above scenarios is possible.
> > thanks
> > lucky
> >
> >
> > On Wed,
> Apr 4, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Are
> you stating that you want to stand up another L2L tunnel, with a
> >> separate
> IP (from the same /28 block) on the outside Interface of the 1841?
> >> You
> might be able to use ip add x x secondary, but I don't know that it
> >> would
> work, and could get messy. Now, you mentioned a checkpoint device, so
> >> I'm
> assuming maybe you have a checkpoint device on the inside? Could you
> >> NAT
> from the outside to the inside to the checkpoint and terminate your VPN
> >>
> there?
> >>
> >> Sorry of I missed the context of your question.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
> >> Sent from iJay
> >>
> >> On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:31
> PM, Lucky <iamreallylucky_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi expert guys,
> >> >
> >> >
> i am using cisco 1841 which is terminated from - fiber link 22mbps
> >> >
> connection in singapore .
> >> >
> >> > I have 16 free ip for this line. right
> there is only two ethernet
> >> interface
> >> > used for in and out.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> > from my network vpn is created to another location in london , now i
> >> want
> >> > to create another vpn connection using another ip and isloated few
> users
> >> > through another
> >> > firewall (checkpoint).
> >> >
> >> > is this possible
> with single link termination from one router nat
> >> outside
> >> > and two ports
> for nat inside with the other ips.
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> > lucky
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >
> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> >
> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at
> http://www.ccie.net
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri May 04 2012 - 10:38:16 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 17 2012 - 09:04:19 ART