show mls qos

From: marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:45:55 -0700

When no mls QoS globally, frames are forwarded FIFO with no alterations in
header. That is how I remember it ...

Marc

On Monday, April 30, 2012, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:

> It's not the same for COS and DSCP.
> A switch works mainly at L2, so L3's DSCP would pass unnoticed (and
> unchanged) when QoS is disabled.
> But COS has to be regenerated along the new frame at L2 (only when there's
> a COS field to begin with, i.e. usually a trunk).
>
> I'm not sure what a switch does there, not even sure all switches do the
> same. I would suspect they send COS 0.
>
> -Carlos
>
> marc edwards @ 29/04/2012 20:13 -0300 dixit:
>
>> It will ignore markings
>>
>> regards,
>> marc
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:06 PM, emir d souza<emir979_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi experts,
>>>
>>> Will a switch rewrite cos/dscp markings to "zero" if qos has been
>>> disabled?
>>> Or does it choose to ignore any markings.
>>>
>>> #show mls qos
>>> QoS is disabled
>>> QoS ip packet dscp rewrite is enabled
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>> ___________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>> ___________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 30 2012 - 06:45:55 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 01 2012 - 08:20:46 ART