Re: FR mapping of IPv6 address and broadcast keyword

It doesn't matter where you put it. On frame maps, the "broadcast"
keyword is a parameter to the DLCI number and the protocol, not the
address.

I highly recommend *not* putting broadcast on multiple instances of
the same DLCI for the same protocol, as that will multiply the traffic
generated as the result of pseudobroadcast replication.

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 03:54, Ivan Hrvatska <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> just one short question about FR mapping and IPV6 addresses. Since
> OSPFv3, EIGRPv6 and RIPng uses link-local FE80:: addresses for
> protocol communication and next-hop, what seems to be correct:
> a) putting broadcast keyword on static mapping of link-local
> b) putting broadcast keyword on static mapping of "actual" IPv6 address
>
> In Cisco literature they put it only on link-local mapping. I followed
> that and routing protocols work fine. In some vendors WBs broadcast
> keyword is put on mapping with non-link-local address and on some labs
> on both mapping.
>
> So, what would be the appropriate way to do it on lab?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net