Re: Basic Access List Question

Of course. I know. I'm talking about it in a packet filtering point of
view. I'm not talking about qos or route-map.

Regards,
MS

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Shaughn <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Why is that strange ?
>
> The ACL could be being used for many other things like QOS classification,
> Route-map etc
>
> CCIE # 23962 (SP)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 10 Apr 2012, at 7:18 AM, Myung-Soo Ko <bacchus21_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ip access-group 1 in was missing in interface configuration mode.
> >
> > Regards,
> > MS
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:16 PM, GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> What strange thing did you saw ?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Myung-Soo Ko <bacchus21_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello, Group
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for asking such a basic question but I need clarification.
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to make ACL effective without access-group command?
> >>>
> >>> For example, ACL configuration works in the following way.
> >>>
> >>> access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
> >>> int fa 0/0
> >>> ip access-group 1 in
> >>>
> >>> For the configuration above, is it possible to make access-list 1 work
> >>> without " ip access-group 1 in"?
> >>>
> >>> I think it's not possible, but I found strange configuration in
> production
> >>> environment.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Myung-Soo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 10 2012 - 14:46:20 ART