Re: Basic Access List Question

Why is that strange ?

The ACL could be being used for many other things like QOS classification, Route-map etc

CCIE # 23962 (SP)

Sent from my iPhone

On 10 Apr 2012, at 7:18 AM, Myung-Soo Ko <bacchus21_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> ip access-group 1 in was missing in interface configuration mode.
>
> Regards,
> MS
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:16 PM, GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> What strange thing did you saw ?
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Myung-Soo Ko <bacchus21_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, Group
>>>
>>> Sorry for asking such a basic question but I need clarification.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to make ACL effective without access-group command?
>>>
>>> For example, ACL configuration works in the following way.
>>>
>>> access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
>>> int fa 0/0
>>> ip access-group 1 in
>>>
>>> For the configuration above, is it possible to make access-list 1 work
>>> without " ip access-group 1 in"?
>>>
>>> I think it's not possible, but I found strange configuration in production
>>> environment.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Myung-Soo
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 10 2012 - 07:42:04 ART