Re: Basic Access List Question

 ip access-group 1 in was missing in interface configuration mode.

Regards,
MS

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:16 PM, GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> What strange thing did you saw ?
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Myung-Soo Ko <bacchus21_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello, Group
>>
>> Sorry for asking such a basic question but I need clarification.
>>
>> Is it possible to make ACL effective without access-group command?
>>
>> For example, ACL configuration works in the following way.
>>
>> access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
>> int fa 0/0
>> ip access-group 1 in
>>
>> For the configuration above, is it possible to make access-list 1 work
>> without " ip access-group 1 in"?
>>
>> I think it's not possible, but I found strange configuration in production
>> environment.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Regards,
>> Myung-Soo
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 10 2012 - 14:18:19 ART