Narbik and Marc,
Thanks for your responses. All of those are great ways to mitigate any
problem in that scenario.
Thanks
Tom
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> How about using distance command under the routing process of r4 and r5
> that changes AD on devices to 89
>
> IE
>
> distance 89 {neighbor-address} 0.0.0.0
>
> replace {} with address of the adjacency
>
> HTH
>
> Marc
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:42 PM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No, I don't think so.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Marc,
>> > Yes, that's an alternative, but i'm wondering if there is a nicer
>> solution
>> > similar to the one in PPP, where it would work all of the time.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Tom
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:59 PM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Can't you just manipulate the metrics to make the serial link
>> >> more preferred?
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>> I came upon a scenario that I'm not sure how to solve, hopefully
>> someone
>> >>> can help.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have three routers connected in a triangle.
>> >>> (R4)-s0/0/1------s0/0/1-(R5)-s0/0/0------R3---R4
>> >>>
>> >>> On R4 and R5 I'm trying to setup ip unnumbered address based on a
>> >>> loopback.
>> >>> The serial interfaces are running hdlc.
>> >>> I have eigrp enabled on all interface.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here is the problem.
>> >>> R4 seems R5 as an eigrp neighbor over s0/0/1, R5 sees the same things,
>> >>> but
>> >>> they prefer to route to each other using R3 as it has a lower metric.
>> >>> I know that if I had used PPP encapsulation, then each router would
>> >>> install a host route to the directly connected interface (s0/0/1), but
>> >>> when
>> >>> using hdlc that does not happen.
>> >>>
>> >>> D 167.1.45.5/32 [90/4857856] via 167.1.34.3, 00:12:19,
>> Serial0/0/0
>> >>> <-R4 uses R3 as the next hop
>> >>> C 167.1.45.4/32 is directly connected, Loopback45
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Does anyone know how to solve this?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> (by the way this is a modified version of the INE vol 2 lab 14 task
>> 1.7)
>> >>>
>> >>> Tom
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 09 2012 - 09:26:21 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 01 2012 - 08:20:45 ART