Re: HDLC IP unnumbered with EIGRP

How about an EIGRP offset-list on the non-preferred link? That way you
don't have to muck with bandwidth/delay on your interfaces and you can
still influence metrics.

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Narbik and Marc,
> Thanks for your responses. All of those are great ways to mitigate any
> problem in that scenario.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > How about using distance command under the routing process of r4 and r5
> > that changes AD on devices to 89
> >
> > IE
> >
> > distance 89 {neighbor-address} 0.0.0.0
> >
> > replace {} with address of the adjacency
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:42 PM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> No, I don't think so.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Marc,
> >> > Yes, that's an alternative, but i'm wondering if there is a nicer
> >> solution
> >> > similar to the one in PPP, where it would work all of the time.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Tom
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:59 PM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Can't you just manipulate the metrics to make the serial link
> >> >> more preferred?
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>> I came upon a scenario that I'm not sure how to solve, hopefully
> >> someone
> >> >>> can help.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have three routers connected in a triangle.
> >> >>> (R4)-s0/0/1------s0/0/1-(R5)-s0/0/0------R3---R4
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On R4 and R5 I'm trying to setup ip unnumbered address based on a
> >> >>> loopback.
> >> >>> The serial interfaces are running hdlc.
> >> >>> I have eigrp enabled on all interface.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Here is the problem.
> >> >>> R4 seems R5 as an eigrp neighbor over s0/0/1, R5 sees the same
> things,
> >> >>> but
> >> >>> they prefer to route to each other using R3 as it has a lower
> metric.
> >> >>> I know that if I had used PPP encapsulation, then each router would
> >> >>> install a host route to the directly connected interface (s0/0/1),
> but
> >> >>> when
> >> >>> using hdlc that does not happen.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> D 167.1.45.5/32 [90/4857856] via 167.1.34.3, 00:12:19,
> >> Serial0/0/0
> >> >>> <-R4 uses R3 as the next hop
> >> >>> C 167.1.45.4/32 is directly connected, Loopback45
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Does anyone know how to solve this?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thank you
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> (by the way this is a modified version of the INE vol 2 lab 14 task
> >> 1.7)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Tom
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Joe Astorino
CCIE #24347
http://astorinonetworks.com
"He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net