RE: Nexus 3K - 5K comparison

From: Bob Sinclair <bob_at_bobsinclair.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:16:47 -0400

Hi Jack,

Numbers I have are 2 usec for 5500 and 3.2 usec for 5010 and 5020.

HTH,

-Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 8:52 AM
To: Bogdan Sass
Cc: bob_at_bobsinclair.net; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Nexus 3K - 5K comparison

Hi,

When Datasheet says 1us of latency between two ports of 3K.
What is latency for 5K - Datasheet says it is low letancy switch.

Regards

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Bogdan Sass <bogd.no.spam_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22/03/2012 18:00, jack daniels wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just read FCOE is not supported on 3K , then how come it will be
>> used in DC.
>> 5K has FCOE.
>
> The 3K is a very specialized device, built for ultra-low-latency
> applications (trading and such). You are unlikely to find it in a
"regular"
> data center.
>
> --
> Bogdan Sass
> CCSP,LPIC-1,VCP510-DT,CCIE #22221 (RS) Information Systems Security
> Professional "Curiosity was framed - ignorance killed the cat"
>

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4898 - Release Date: 03/27/12

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4898 - Release Date: 03/27/12
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4898 - Release Date: 03/27/12
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4898 - Release Date: 03/27/12

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Mar 28 2012 - 06:16:47 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 01 2012 - 07:56:52 ART