Re: bgp local preference

Joe,

You said:
(("You are a real piece of garbage")). I didn't need to read that and
neither did anyone else.

I thought Marko's correction earlier is how you handle someone who is trying
to cheat or MAY HAVE accidentally said something inappropriate. That was
Professional and with tact.

If that does not work,

Here are a few options:
1)Dude...that's a direct violation NDA!
2)Why would you say you have seen this before somewhere? It could get you in
a lot of trouble.

I understand that you are upset with cheaters but C'MON.

Paul

-- 
Paul Negron
CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
Senior Technical Instructor
> From: Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:23:13 -0400
> To: Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>, nitin shettigar
> <nitinbizzy_at_gmail.com>, Carlos Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>, Brian Dennis
> <bdennis_at_ine.com>, <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: bgp local preference
> 
> Is this a joke? Everybody is thinking the same thing, I'm just saying
> it. You know what sets me off? Cheaters. Not sure why you are so upset
> and why you feel the need to personally attack me for sharing my
> opinion. It is pretty unbelievable that you can find time for this but
> not to say anything at all about a clear NDA violation on the list.
> Yeah, let's all just let that go and be nice. Guess what? I don't work
> for a training vendor here and I am not forced to be nice.
> 
> Also, yeah I did not see the solution at first (and with all due
> respect not all the facts were given). It happens and I admit when I
> am wrong or missed something. What does that have to do with calling
> this guy out for cheating? Oh wait, NOTHING. You are calling me out on
> list because you don't like my opinion...how is this at all different
> than what you are whining about?
> 
>  You are welcome to disagree with my opinion and comments and I
> respect your right to do whatever you want to do, but please don't sit
> here and attack my credibility because you are upset.
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/13/12, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> This coming from the guy who said.
>> 
>> " Local preference is an attribute local to an AS so doing this without
>> touching AS 200 would be IMPOSSIBLE."
>> 
>> YUP. Real Class Act.
>> 
>> Unicast it next time !! Tough Guy!!!
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry Marko, Brian....that comment set me off. I'll unicast it next time!
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Paul Negron
>> CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
>> Senior Technical Instructor
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:12:23 -0400
>>> To: nitin shettigar <nitinbizzy_at_gmail.com>, Carlos Mendioroz
>>> <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>, Brian Dennis
>>> <bdennis_at_ine.com>, <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>> Subject: Re: bgp local preference
>>> 
>>> Hi Nittin,
>>> 
>>> You are a real piece of garbage. Here is a concept - study and learn
>>> instead of cheating. What an epiphany!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/13/12, nitin shettigar <nitinbizzy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I had this issue in the CCIE tshoot exam.
>>>> So will the above solution valid for tshoot??
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you Markov and Denis for your efforts..
>>>> 
>>>> - Nitin
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Carlos Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Why. not?
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carlos Mendioroz <tron_at_acm.org>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original message-----
>>>>> 
>>>>> *From: *nitin shettigar <nitinbizzy_at_gmail.com>*
>>>>> To: *Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>*
>>>>> Cc: *Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>, Brian Dennis
>>>>> <bdennis_at_ine.com>,
>>>>> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com*
>>>>> Sent: *Tue, 13 Mar 2012, 15:48:03 GMT+00:00
>>>>> *
>>>>> Subject: *Re: bgp local preference
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is the solution provided applicable in CCIE exam??
>>>>> 
>>>>>  - Nitin
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz
>>>>> <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> but the other is ? :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Actually, both have to be configured for confederation, right ?
>>>>>> Also, it might be the case that AS100 has a route-map with some
>>>>>> logic that sets LP based on preset communities, so you just have to
>>>>>> figure out which is the community you have to set, and enable it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Carlos
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Paul Negron @ 13/03/2012 03:14 -0300 dixit:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  That's the only way I could think of this. But you would have to
>>>>>> assume
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> other router was configured as a confederation already.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> He did not state that but I was not sure if it was a challenge or if
>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>> really wanted to know how.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Kind of like the riddle..... you have to make 2 coins that equal 30
>>>>>>> cents.
>>>>>>> One of them is not a Quarter.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>>>>> ___________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/**
>>>>>> list/CCIELab.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Joe Astorino
>>> CCIE #24347
>>> http://astorinonetworks.com
>>> 
>>> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my mobile device
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Joe Astorino
> CCIE #24347
> http://astorinonetworks.com
> 
> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net